23.02.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

YFksc

YFksc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to alleviate hunger by supplementing the food budgets of low-income<br />

households. SNAP is broadly available to most low-income households,<br />

with eligibility based primarily on income and assets. Over 45 million<br />

Americans, including almost 7 million children under the age of 5, received<br />

SNAP in FY 2014, as well as the elderly, working families, and individuals<br />

with disabilities.<br />

Eligible households generally must have a gross monthly income<br />

below 130 percent of the official poverty guideline for their family size and<br />

a net income that falls below the poverty line (USDA 2015). SNAP benefits<br />

are distributed to eligible households on a monthly basis in the form of an<br />

electronic benefit transfer (EBT) card, which can be used to purchase eligible<br />

foods at authorized retail stores. The level of SNAP benefits is intended to fill<br />

the gap between a household’s cash resources that are available to spend on<br />

food and the amount needed to purchase a nutritious diet at minimal cost.<br />

The latter amount is calculated using a model-based market basket of foods<br />

known as the Thrifty Food Plan (TFP), which is adjusted for household size<br />

but not for other factors such as local prices. The benefit formula assumes<br />

that households can contribute 30 percent of their net income to purchase<br />

food. A household’s SNAP allotment is thus equal to the TFP-based measure<br />

of need, which gives the maximum allotment for that household’s size, less<br />

30 percent of the household’s net income.<br />

SNAP plays an important role in reducing poverty in the United States<br />

and has been shown to be highly effective at reducing food insecurity. In<br />

2014, SNAP benefits directly lifted at least 4.7 million Americans, including<br />

2.1 million children, over the poverty line. Research has also shown that,<br />

among households who receive SNAP, food insecurity rates are up to 30<br />

percent lower than they otherwise would be, with impacts for children that<br />

are at least this large (Council of Economic Advisers 2015c).<br />

A growing body of high-quality research shows that SNAP and its<br />

functionally similar predecessor, the Food Stamp Program, have led to<br />

significant improvements in the health and wellbeing for those who receive<br />

food assistance as young children. Almond, Hoynes, and Schanzenbach<br />

(2011) study the impact of the early Food Stamp Program on birth outcomes<br />

by studying the initial rollout of the program across US counties between<br />

1961 and 1975. Using county level variation in the timing of implementation,<br />

they find that a mother’s access to Food Stamps during pregnancy led<br />

to increased birth weight, with the greatest gains at the lower end of the<br />

birth-weight distribution.<br />

Related recent work uses similar cross-State variation and longitudinal<br />

data on children who received food stamps before birth and in the<br />

first few years of life, following them throughout their adolescence and into<br />

186 | Chapter 4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!