23.02.2016 Views

ECONOMIC REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT

YFksc

YFksc

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

above GDP growth. In fact, at the annual revision in July, BEA revisited<br />

its seasonal adjustment and incorporated revised source data, which led<br />

to an upward revision in 2015:Q1 GDP growth.<br />

It has long been the practice in many economic analyses, including<br />

those at CEA, to combine product- and income-side measures of output<br />

as a way to reduce measurement error and gain a more accurate picture<br />

of the economy. In fact, CEA began using an average of GDP and GDI<br />

with the 1997 Economic Report to the President. No single measure of the<br />

economy is perfect. Measures are subject to measurement error, transitory<br />

shocks, and conceptual challenges. As a result, it is important to look<br />

at multiple measures of economic conditions and over longer periods of<br />

time to discern trends. Widening the focus from GDP to other measures<br />

of output like GDO provides a more accurate and forward-looking<br />

picture of the state of the economy.<br />

income expectations was particularly welcome and likely supported spending<br />

growth in 2015. Expected real income growth, as measured in the<br />

Michigan Survey, fell sharply during the recession and remained depressed<br />

even after actual real income growth had begun to recover. This heightened<br />

pessimism contrasted with the past several decades—when income expectations<br />

and actual income growth tended move together reasonably well<br />

(Figure 2-16; Sahm 2013). Unusual caution about income prospects may<br />

have weighed on consumer borrowing and spending growth. The rebound<br />

in income expectations in 2015 was a sign that the extra pessimism may have<br />

begun to wane.<br />

Meanwhile, the debt of U.S. households relative to their disposable<br />

income continued to fall (Figure 2-17). Before the financial crisis, household<br />

debt relative to income rose dramatically, largely due to net mortgage<br />

originations, and then declined sharply after the crisis, a pattern known as<br />

“deleveraging.” Charge offs of delinquent mortgage debt played an important<br />

role in lowering household debt, but the decline in new mortgage originations<br />

played a role as well (Vidangos 2015). By the end of 2015:Q2, the<br />

debt-to-income ratio was at its lowest level since 2002. The level of mortgage<br />

debt relative to income continued to decline in 2015, while consumer credit<br />

(including credit card, auto, and student loans) relative to income increased<br />

slightly.<br />

Moreover, with historically low interest rates, the amount of income<br />

required to service these debts has fallen dramatically. Estimates based on<br />

aggregate data, could mask higher debt burdens for some families; that<br />

is, the health of personal finances varies substantially across households.<br />

78 | Chapter 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!