03.03.2016 Views

MacroeconomicsI_working_version (1)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116<br />

Chapter 12<br />

12.4. Crowding-Out Effect<br />

Having mentioned the effect of financing deficit through government’s borrowing at the<br />

money market, we now move to a basic criticism of fiscal policy itself. This criticism is<br />

based on frequently discussed crowding-out effect. This effect describes the competition<br />

between government and private investors borrowing at money markets, which increases<br />

the interest rate and thus reduce private spending, Accordingly, the expansionary fiscal<br />

effect is weakened or cancelled at all.<br />

Let’s assume the economy is in the contraction phase (recession) of a business cycle.<br />

Government takes an action of discretionary fiscal policy in the form of increased<br />

government spending. Government borrows funds in the money markets to finance its<br />

budget deficit. The resulting increase in demand for money raises the interest rate as a price<br />

paid for borrowing money. Some part of investment or interest-sensitive consumption<br />

spending will be crowded out because investment spending varies inversely with the<br />

interest rate.<br />

12.5. Problems of Timing<br />

In addition to discussed problem of crowding-out effect there are some other problems<br />

associated with enacting and applying fiscal policy. In the case of fiscal policy, some<br />

problems of timing may arise. We can characterise the problem of timing through the lags:<br />

1) Recognition lag. The recognition lag refers to the time between the outset of some<br />

economic problems (such as contraction of output or accelerating inflation) and the<br />

actual recognition of those problems by economists.<br />

2) Administrative lag. This lag relates to the time between recognition of some<br />

problems in the economy and the moment when a fiscal action is actually taken.<br />

The administrative lag is typical for democratic governments with long and difficult<br />

ratification process.<br />

3) Operational lag. The impact of some fiscal action on output or employment<br />

doesn’t reveal immediately. There is a lag between a change in output, employment<br />

or the price level caused by the change in fiscal policy and the time when the<br />

relevant fiscal action was actually taken.<br />

12.6. The Advantage of Monetary Policy<br />

Most economists in these days prefer monetary policy as the main tool to stabilise the<br />

economy in the short or middle-run. Fiscal policy, according to them, should be used to<br />

deal with the nation’s investment-saving imbalances. In this view, the fiscal policy should<br />

be used to deal with some deep economic crisis in terms of a decline in output,<br />

employment or rapid growth in inflation. The advantage of monetary policy is that<br />

monetary policy can be changed quickly because of an independence of the central bank,<br />

which does not need any approval of parliament to use any chosen monetary measures<br />

such as change in credit conditions, interest rates or money stock. In addition to that,<br />

monetary policy is considered very effective in expanding or contracting the economy<br />

comparing to fiscal policy.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!