05.03.2016 Views

In Search of Evidence

jqluvth

jqluvth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Seeing is Believing<br />

Of all the saints, Doubting Thomas is my favorite. The Gospel <strong>of</strong> John tells us how<br />

Jesus appeared three days after his death before his disciples when Thomas is not<br />

there. When his fellow disciples enthusiastically declare, ‘We have seen the Lord,’<br />

Thomas reacts with disbelief, wanting to see concrete evidence <strong>of</strong> his former master’s<br />

resurrection. About a week later, Jesus appears again, this time before all <strong>of</strong> his<br />

disciples, and says to Thomas, ‘reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be<br />

not faithless, but believing.’ Thomas, still not convinced, initially refuses. <strong>In</strong> the painting<br />

by Caravaggio that is on the cover <strong>of</strong> this thesis, it is suggested that Jesus has to take<br />

Thomas’s hand and force his doubting disciple to put his finger into his wounds. Only<br />

when he sees as well as feels the evidence that Jesus is alive and not the product <strong>of</strong> a<br />

collective hallucination does Thomas exclaim, ‘My Lord and my God.’ Jesus, unamused<br />

by Thomas’s apparent lack <strong>of</strong> faith, then declares, ‘Because you have seen me, you<br />

have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed’ (John<br />

20:24—29).<br />

As an evidence-based practitioner, I have every sympathy with Thomas. After all,<br />

extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and a claim that a person is<br />

resurrected from the dead therefore needs more compelling evidence than the<br />

eyewitness testimony <strong>of</strong> close friends who are still shocked and grieving over his loss.<br />

When confronted with a dilemma or problem, many people ask themselves, ‘What<br />

would Jesus do?’ <strong>In</strong> their book Doubting Thomas has a Point, Johan Braeckman and<br />

Maarten Boudry argue that one should ask instead, ‘What would Thomas do?’ I agree.<br />

Asking for evidence to back up claims, especially when made in a pr<strong>of</strong>essional context,<br />

is the first and possibly most important step to evidence-based practice. And here’s the<br />

good news: asking critical questions does not require a Harvard degree; everyone can<br />

do it. Thomas was just a poor fisherman born in Galilee from a poor family and was<br />

therefore most likely uneducated, but his lack <strong>of</strong> formal knowledge was more than<br />

compensated for by his evidence-based approach.<br />

Seeing is Believing — Or is it?<br />

‘Seeing is believing’ is the essence <strong>of</strong> Thomas’s approach to Jesus’s resurrection<br />

miracle. Seeing, however, is not enough, because what people see is <strong>of</strong>ten what they<br />

want to see: we are inclined to interpret evidence in ways that confirm our existing<br />

beliefs, and to ignore evidence to the contrary. This is not because we are stupid or<br />

ignorant, but because this is the way the human brain works.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!