In Search of Evidence
jqluvth
jqluvth
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Managers’ Attitudes and Perceived Barriers<br />
than their own, which points to the possibility that, according to the Theory <strong>of</strong><br />
Planned Behavior, social norms may constrain them from applying evidence-based<br />
management to their daily practice (Ajzen, 1991). Such conditions suggest that it is<br />
likely to be easier for managers to engage in evidence-based management where<br />
they are in senior positions within their organizations or where they work with<br />
others who are like-minded. Educating a new generation <strong>of</strong> managers to engage<br />
in evidence-based management is important to the development <strong>of</strong> like-minded<br />
colleagues and the development <strong>of</strong> norms supporting evidence use.<br />
Importantly, most managers we sampled appear to have an interest in research<br />
and feel that topics researchers investigate are <strong>of</strong> practical relevance. This is an<br />
important message to researchers — i.e. that practitioners might be more receptive<br />
to their work than they had previously assumed, suggesting that they should<br />
seriously consider putting more effort into communicating their findings effectively<br />
for multiple audiences, rather then solely focusing on the academic community.<br />
However, given that most managers do not read academic journals and do not<br />
have access to research databases, one might wonder if managers are sufficiently<br />
familiar with research topics being investigated to adequately answer this question.<br />
For instance, managers may have positive attitudes to research in general, but<br />
when presented with actual research findings may feel that they are not especially<br />
meaningful. <strong>In</strong> addition, they may even feel negative about research that<br />
challenges their particular practices. Further, our findings suggest that the way in<br />
which relevance is defined and measured plays a role in determining the perceived<br />
relevance <strong>of</strong> research evidence for practicing managers. To remedy this, researchers<br />
might consider focusing on the types <strong>of</strong> beliefs that are most consequential for<br />
decision-making (e.g., reactions to specific research evidence as encountered in<br />
practice).<br />
Our study indicates that lack <strong>of</strong> time is perceived as the most important barrier<br />
to the uptake <strong>of</strong> evidence-based management. It implies that the role <strong>of</strong> senior<br />
management in terms <strong>of</strong> promoting and developing an organizational culture in<br />
which practitioners have time to consult scientific evidence before making an<br />
important decision may be an essential prerequisite. This implication is in line with<br />
the findings from a recent systematic review that examined the relation between<br />
evidence-based nursing implementation and leadership among nurses, suggesting<br />
that leadership and culture are the most important factors for the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> evidence-based practice (Flödgren, Parmelli, & Doumit, 2011), and consistent<br />
with the Theory <strong>of</strong> Planned Behavior’s prediction that the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
evidence-based practice is partly determined by contextual barriers. However, lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> time may also be a barrier that lies at the personal level, suggesting that