05.03.2016 Views

In Search of Evidence

jqluvth

jqluvth

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Managers’ Attitudes and Perceived Barriers<br />

than their own, which points to the possibility that, according to the Theory <strong>of</strong><br />

Planned Behavior, social norms may constrain them from applying evidence-based<br />

management to their daily practice (Ajzen, 1991). Such conditions suggest that it is<br />

likely to be easier for managers to engage in evidence-based management where<br />

they are in senior positions within their organizations or where they work with<br />

others who are like-minded. Educating a new generation <strong>of</strong> managers to engage<br />

in evidence-based management is important to the development <strong>of</strong> like-minded<br />

colleagues and the development <strong>of</strong> norms supporting evidence use.<br />

Importantly, most managers we sampled appear to have an interest in research<br />

and feel that topics researchers investigate are <strong>of</strong> practical relevance. This is an<br />

important message to researchers — i.e. that practitioners might be more receptive<br />

to their work than they had previously assumed, suggesting that they should<br />

seriously consider putting more effort into communicating their findings effectively<br />

for multiple audiences, rather then solely focusing on the academic community.<br />

However, given that most managers do not read academic journals and do not<br />

have access to research databases, one might wonder if managers are sufficiently<br />

familiar with research topics being investigated to adequately answer this question.<br />

For instance, managers may have positive attitudes to research in general, but<br />

when presented with actual research findings may feel that they are not especially<br />

meaningful. <strong>In</strong> addition, they may even feel negative about research that<br />

challenges their particular practices. Further, our findings suggest that the way in<br />

which relevance is defined and measured plays a role in determining the perceived<br />

relevance <strong>of</strong> research evidence for practicing managers. To remedy this, researchers<br />

might consider focusing on the types <strong>of</strong> beliefs that are most consequential for<br />

decision-making (e.g., reactions to specific research evidence as encountered in<br />

practice).<br />

Our study indicates that lack <strong>of</strong> time is perceived as the most important barrier<br />

to the uptake <strong>of</strong> evidence-based management. It implies that the role <strong>of</strong> senior<br />

management in terms <strong>of</strong> promoting and developing an organizational culture in<br />

which practitioners have time to consult scientific evidence before making an<br />

important decision may be an essential prerequisite. This implication is in line with<br />

the findings from a recent systematic review that examined the relation between<br />

evidence-based nursing implementation and leadership among nurses, suggesting<br />

that leadership and culture are the most important factors for the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> evidence-based practice (Flödgren, Parmelli, & Doumit, 2011), and consistent<br />

with the Theory <strong>of</strong> Planned Behavior’s prediction that the implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

evidence-based practice is partly determined by contextual barriers. However, lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> time may also be a barrier that lies at the personal level, suggesting that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!