From Buddha-to-be to Teacher in the Buddha’s own Words
A translation of sections from four discourses in the Majjhimanikāya in which the Buddha relates his experiences in struggling to attain Awakening, and whether to teach afterwards
A translation of sections from four discourses in the Majjhimanikāya in which the Buddha relates his experiences in struggling to attain Awakening, and whether to teach afterwards
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Initial Practices - 11<br />
Then after a little time I <strong>in</strong>deed, merely through <strong>be</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g my lips,<br />
merely through repeat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prattl<strong>in</strong>g, spoke know<strong>in</strong>gly about that<br />
teach<strong>in</strong>g and confidently about that teach<strong>in</strong>g, claim<strong>in</strong>g: ‘I know, I<br />
see.’ Both I and o<strong>the</strong>rs also.<br />
Then this occurred <strong>to</strong> me: ‘Rāma did not declare: Through mere<br />
faith <strong>in</strong> this Dhamma alone, hav<strong>in</strong>g knowledge of it myself, I live,<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g directly experienced and atta<strong>in</strong>ed it, for sure Rāma lived<br />
know<strong>in</strong>g and see<strong>in</strong>g this Dhamma.’<br />
Then I approached Uddaka Rāmaputta, and after approach<strong>in</strong>g, I said<br />
this <strong>to</strong> Uddaka Rāmaputta: “In what way, friend, did Rāma declare: I<br />
have deep knowledge of this Dhamma myself, hav<strong>in</strong>g directly<br />
experienced and atta<strong>in</strong>ed it?”<br />
When this was said Uddaka Rāmaputta declared <strong>the</strong> Sphere of<br />
Nei<strong>the</strong>r-Perception-nor-Non-Perception. 9<br />
Then this occurred <strong>to</strong> me:<br />
‘There was not faith for Rāma alone,<br />
for me also <strong>the</strong>re is faith,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re was not energy for Rāma alone,<br />
for me also <strong>the</strong>re is energy,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re was not m<strong>in</strong>dfulness for Rāma alone,<br />
for me also <strong>the</strong>re is m<strong>in</strong>dfulness,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re was not concentration for Rāma alone,<br />
for me also <strong>the</strong>re is concentration,<br />
<strong>the</strong>re was not wisdom for Rāma alone,<br />
for me also <strong>the</strong>re is wisdom.<br />
What if, <strong>in</strong> regard <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Dhamma that Rāma declared: I have deep<br />
knowledge of it myself, I live, hav<strong>in</strong>g directly experienced and<br />
atta<strong>in</strong>ed it, I were <strong>to</strong> strive <strong>to</strong> realise that Dhamma?’<br />
9 The very highest level <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> thirty-one Realms of Existence. The way this<br />
is stated is odd <strong>in</strong> that we might have expected Uddaka <strong>to</strong> have claimed<br />
this for Rāma, but <strong>the</strong> way it is written it appears he claims it for himself.