Transparency Initiative (EITI)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

ANNEX I: EITI REQUIREMENT 7 – OUTCOMES AND IMPACT 101
102 Annex I: EITI Requirement 7 – Outcomes and Impact 7.1 PUBLIC DEBATE The following Requirement 7 is reprinted from the EITI Standard 2013/2016 for purposes of finding references. The multi-stakeholder group must ensure that the EITI Report is comprehensible, actively promoted, publicly accessible and contributes to public debate. Key audiences should include government, parliamentarians, civil society, companies and the media. The multi-stakeholder group is required to: a. Produce paper copies of the EITI Report, and ensure that they are widely distributed. Where the report contains extensive data, e.g. voluminous files, the multistakeholder group is encouraged to make this available online. b. Agree a clear policy on the access, release and re-use of EITI data. Implementing countries are encouraged publish EITI under an open license, and to make users aware that information can be reused without prior consent. c. Make the EITI Report available in an open data format (xlsx or csv) online and publicise its availability. d. Ensure that the EITI Report is comprehensible, including by ensuring that it is written in a clear, accessible style and in appropriate languages. e. Ensure that outreach events, whether organised by government, civil society or companies, are undertaken to spread awareness of and facilitate dia-logue about the EITI Report across the country. Overview: Regular disclosure of extractive industry data is of little practical use without public awareness, understanding of what the figures mean, and public debate about how resource revenues can be used effectively. The EITI Requirements related to outcomes and impact seek to ensure that stakeholders are engaged in dialogue about natural resource revenue management. EITI Reports lead to the fulfilment of the EITI Principles by contributing to wider public debate. It is also vital that lessons learnt during implementation are acted upon, that discrepancies identified in EITI Reports are explained and, if necessary, addressed, and that EITI implemenstation is on a stable, sustainable footing. 7.2 DATA ACCESSIBILITY The multi-stakeholder group is encouraged to make EITI Reports machine readable, and to code or tag EITI Reports and data files so that the information can be compared with other publicly available data by adopting Board-approved EITI data standards. As per Requirement 5.1(b), the multistakeholder group is encour-aged to reference national revenue classification systems, and international standards such as the IMF Government Finance Statistics Manual. The multi-stakeholder group is encouraged to: a. Produce brief summary reports, with clear and balanced analysis of the information, ensuring that the authorship of different elements of the EITI Report is clearly stated.
Page 1 and 2:
Assessing the Effectiveness and Imp
Page 3 and 4:
2 Content ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINIT
Page 5 and 6:
4 Abbreviations and definitions ABB
Page 7 and 8:
6 Requirements The seven requiremen
Page 9 and 10:
8 Executive summary This study asse
Page 11 and 12:
10 Executive summary 15. High(er) e
Page 13 and 14:
12 Executive summary COOPERATION 5.
Page 15 and 16:
14 Introduction 2.1 ABOUT THE EITI
Page 17 and 18:
16 Introduction FIGURE 1: VISUALIZI
Page 19 and 20:
18 Introduction 2.2 THE ROLE OF GER
Page 21 and 22:
20 Introduction 2.4 STRUCTURE OF TH
Page 23 and 24:
22 Methodology There is a notable a
Page 25 and 26:
24 Methodology 3.2 MACRO DATA: GLOB
Page 27 and 28:
26 Methodology 3.3 CASE STUDIES: CO
Page 29 and 30:
28 Methodology FIGURE 2: RESPONDENT
Page 31 and 32:
30 Methodology
Page 33 and 34:
32 Generic Results Model 4. GENERIC
Page 35 and 36:
34 Generic Results Model Outcome: T
Page 37 and 38:
36 Generic Results Model (between m
Page 39:
38 Generic Results Model 39 Levels
Page 42 and 43:
41 5. LITERATURE REVIEW
Page 44 and 45:
43 the report leaves unclear what k
Page 46 and 47:
45 5.2.1 FISCAL TRANSPARENCY `` A n
Page 48 and 49:
47 5.2.3 ANTI-CORRUPTION es members
Page 50 and 51:
49 5.2.4 TRADE AND INVESTMENT CLIMA
Page 52 and 53: 51 6. MACRO DATA: GLOBAL STATISTICA
Page 54 and 55: 53 from the analysis are quite sobe
Page 56 and 57: 55 7. OPEN ONLINE SURVEY
Page 58 and 59: 57 FIGURE 5: IMPACTS OF EITI ∙ No
Page 60 and 61: 59 8. CASE STUDY: DEMOCRATIC REPUBL
Page 62 and 63: 61 FIGURE 7: DRC’S PATH TO EITI C
Page 64 and 65: 63 8.2 RESULTS MODEL Given the incr
Page 66 and 67: 65 Levels Areas Indicators (in addi
Page 68 and 69: 67 8.3.1 FISCAL TRANSPARENCY The EI
Page 70 and 71: 69 The EITI’s effectiveness is co
Page 72 and 73: 71 8.4 CONCLUSION Although the DRC
Page 74 and 75: 73 9. CASE STUDY: MOZAMBIQUE
Page 76 and 77: 75 EITI Standard and published on D
Page 78 and 79: 77 9.2 RESULTS MODEL To shed light
Page 80 and 81: 79 Fiscal transparency and accounta
Page 82 and 83: 81 9.3.2 PUBLIC DEBATE 9.3.3 ANTI-C
Page 84 and 85: 83 9.4 CONCLUSION Effects of the M-
Page 86 and 87: 85 10. CONCLUSIONS
Page 88 and 89: 87 to what degree EITI processes on
Page 90 and 91: 89 where transparency can lead to r
Page 92 and 93: 91 11. RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 94 and 95: 93 periods of time. Probably a pane
Page 96 and 97: 95 12. DOCUMENTS
Page 98 and 99: 97 Transparency Initiative. Corpora
Page 100 and 101: 99 Holland, Jeremy and Thirkell, Al
Page 104 and 105: 103 b. Summarise and compare the sh
Page 106 and 107: ANNEX II: GENERAL INTERVIEW GUIDELI
Page 109: 108 Annes II: General Interview Gui
Page 113 and 114: 112 Annes II: General Interview Gui
Page 115 and 116: 114 Annex III:: Questionnaire www.i
show all

Transparency Initiative (EITI)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?