Transparency Initiative (EITI)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

97 Transparency Initiative. Corporate and Global Evaluations and Methods, World Bank. Joyce, Mary; Walker, Tom (2015): A movements perspective on transparency and accountability. Mildner, Stormy-Annika; Gitta Lauster (2011): Curse or blessing – development or misery. Scrambling to the bottom or scrambling to the top. Natural resources, economic growth, and conflict: a literature review. GIZ, Berlin: Gutendruck. Mouan, Liliane (2014): Building transparency and accountability in Africa’s oil industry: what next for the Extractive Industries Transparency initiative? In: Bohórquez, E.; Etxaniz, N. (eds.): a new generation of public control – ways of promoting Open Governments: concepts, tools and experiences, Mexico: Transparencia Mexicana, 2014, pp. 79-90. MSI Integrity (2015): Protecting the cornerstone. Assessing the governance of Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative Multi-Stakeholder Groups. MSI Integrity (2013): Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Pilot evaluation report. Neumann, Lutz (2014): Kommunikation der Wirkungsorientierung der Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EI- TI). BMZ/GIZ, Bonn. Papyrakis, Elissaios; Rieger, Matthias; Gilberthorpe, Emma (2016): Corruption and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. In; The Journal of Development Studies, pp. 1-15. Rainbow Insight (2009): Evaluating the EITI’s Impact on the Transparency of Natural Resource Revenues, commissioned by the EITI International Secretariat. Ravat, Anwar; Kannan, Sridar P. (eds.) (n.y.): Implementing EITI for impact – a handbook for policy makers and stakeholders. Revenue Watch Institute / Natural Resource Charter (RWI/NRC) (eds.): Options for applying EITI Standards on the enabling environment for civil society – towards a systematic and evidence-based approach. Rustad, Siri; Philippe Le Billon and Päivi Lujula (2016): Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals". Working Paper, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Scanteam (2011): Achievement & strategic options – evaluation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Final Report. Oslo 2011. Scanteam (2015): Ghana Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative in Ghana (GEITI): ten years of achievements: 2004- 2013. Final report. Oslo 2015. Scanteam (2015a): Joint review, EITI and EITI Multi-Donor Trust Fund resourcing of EITI: technical and financial support to an evolving global governance mechanism. Final report. Oslo 2015. Schmaljohann, Maya (2013): Enhancing Foreign Direct Investment via transparency? Evaluating the effects of the EITI on FDI. In: University of Heidelberg, Discussion Paper Series No. 538. Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Götz Walter, Thijs Van de Graaf and Nathan Andrews (2016): Energy governance, transnational rules, and the resource curse: exploring the effectiveness of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). In: World Development, vol. 83, issue C, pp. 179-192. Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Andrews, Nathan (2015): Does transparency matter? Evaluating the governance impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia. In: Resources Policy, Volume 45, pp. 183-192. The Cloudminer Ltd. (2015): Financial reporting, valuation and analysis tools in the cloud for mining, investment and governance professionals. The World Bank (2015): Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Extractives Global Programmatic Support (EGPS). Program concept document. World Bank (2014), Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative – Multi-Donor Trust Fund (EITI MDTF) Results Framework. Valverde, Pablo (2014): The 2014 Corruption Perception Index. How have EITI countries fared? https://eiti.org/ blog/2014-corruption-perception-index-how-haveeiti-countries-fared.
98 Documents FURTHER DOCUMENTS (SELECTED) Westenberg, Erica; George-Wagner, Max (2015): From reporting to reform. Eleven opportunities for increasing EITI impacts. National Resource Governance Institute. Wilson, Emma; Van Alstine, James (2014): Localising Transparency – Exploring EITI’s contribution to sustainable development. International Institute for Environment and Development (Ed.). London: Full Spectrum Print Media Limited. Williams, Andrew (2011): Shining a light on the Resource Curse: an empirical analysis of the relationship between natural resources, transparency, and economic growth. In: World Development, Volume 39, No. 4, pp. 490-505. Bennett, James G. (2011): On the use of results chains in natural resource governance. Basic concepts and exemplary applications to the extractive industries. BMZ/GIZ, Bonn. BMWi (2012): The German Government’s raw materials strategy. Berlin. MZ (2010): Mineral and energy resources as a factor in development. Strategy Paper 04E-2010. CCSI (2016): Mapping Mining to the Sustainable Development Goals: An Atlas. Collier, Paul (2007): The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford University Press, Oxford. DFID (2012): EITI Strategy Working Group (SWG) meeting, April 11/12, 2012 Report from Working Group on theory of change (WGTOC). https://eiti.org/sites/default/ files/DFID%20ToC.pdf EY (2014): Productivity in mining: Now comes the hard part. A global survey. Fraser Institute Survey of Mining Companies (2015). Freedom House (2016): Freedom in the world. Anxious dictators, wavering democracies: Global freedom under pressure. Intergovernmental Forum on Mining, Minerals, Metals and Sustainable Development (2013): A Mining Policy Framework. Mining and sustainable development – managing one to advance the other. IMF (2015): Republic of Mozambique staff report. IMF (2012): Fiscal tansparency, accountability, and risk. James, Paul et al. (2013): Reframing social sustainability reporting: Towards an engaged approach, in: Environment, Development and Sustainability, a multidisciplinary approach to the theory and practice of sustainable development, Volume 15, pp. 225-243. GTZ (2010): Rohstoffgovernance. Politikberatung zum verantwortungsvollen Umgang mit Boden schätzen. Eschborn.
Page 1 and 2:
Assessing the Effectiveness and Imp
Page 3 and 4:
2 Content ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINIT
Page 5 and 6:
4 Abbreviations and definitions ABB
Page 7 and 8:
6 Requirements The seven requiremen
Page 9 and 10:
8 Executive summary This study asse
Page 11 and 12:
10 Executive summary 15. High(er) e
Page 13 and 14:
12 Executive summary COOPERATION 5.
Page 15 and 16:
14 Introduction 2.1 ABOUT THE EITI
Page 17 and 18:
16 Introduction FIGURE 1: VISUALIZI
Page 19 and 20:
18 Introduction 2.2 THE ROLE OF GER
Page 21 and 22:
20 Introduction 2.4 STRUCTURE OF TH
Page 23 and 24:
22 Methodology There is a notable a
Page 25 and 26:
24 Methodology 3.2 MACRO DATA: GLOB
Page 27 and 28:
26 Methodology 3.3 CASE STUDIES: CO
Page 29 and 30:
28 Methodology FIGURE 2: RESPONDENT
Page 31 and 32:
30 Methodology
Page 33 and 34:
32 Generic Results Model 4. GENERIC
Page 35 and 36:
34 Generic Results Model Outcome: T
Page 37 and 38:
36 Generic Results Model (between m
Page 39:
38 Generic Results Model 39 Levels
Page 42 and 43:
41 5. LITERATURE REVIEW
Page 44 and 45:
43 the report leaves unclear what k
Page 46 and 47:
45 5.2.1 FISCAL TRANSPARENCY `` A n
Page 48 and 49: 47 5.2.3 ANTI-CORRUPTION es members
Page 50 and 51: 49 5.2.4 TRADE AND INVESTMENT CLIMA
Page 52 and 53: 51 6. MACRO DATA: GLOBAL STATISTICA
Page 54 and 55: 53 from the analysis are quite sobe
Page 56 and 57: 55 7. OPEN ONLINE SURVEY
Page 58 and 59: 57 FIGURE 5: IMPACTS OF EITI ∙ No
Page 60 and 61: 59 8. CASE STUDY: DEMOCRATIC REPUBL
Page 62 and 63: 61 FIGURE 7: DRC’S PATH TO EITI C
Page 64 and 65: 63 8.2 RESULTS MODEL Given the incr
Page 66 and 67: 65 Levels Areas Indicators (in addi
Page 68 and 69: 67 8.3.1 FISCAL TRANSPARENCY The EI
Page 70 and 71: 69 The EITI’s effectiveness is co
Page 72 and 73: 71 8.4 CONCLUSION Although the DRC
Page 74 and 75: 73 9. CASE STUDY: MOZAMBIQUE
Page 76 and 77: 75 EITI Standard and published on D
Page 78 and 79: 77 9.2 RESULTS MODEL To shed light
Page 80 and 81: 79 Fiscal transparency and accounta
Page 82 and 83: 81 9.3.2 PUBLIC DEBATE 9.3.3 ANTI-C
Page 84 and 85: 83 9.4 CONCLUSION Effects of the M-
Page 86 and 87: 85 10. CONCLUSIONS
Page 88 and 89: 87 to what degree EITI processes on
Page 90 and 91: 89 where transparency can lead to r
Page 92 and 93: 91 11. RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 94 and 95: 93 periods of time. Probably a pane
Page 96 and 97: 95 12. DOCUMENTS
Page 100 and 101: 99 Holland, Jeremy and Thirkell, Al
Page 102 and 103: ANNEX I: EITI REQUIREMENT 7 - OUTCO
Page 104 and 105: 103 b. Summarise and compare the sh
Page 106 and 107: ANNEX II: GENERAL INTERVIEW GUIDELI
Page 109: 108 Annes II: General Interview Gui
Page 113 and 114: 112 Annes II: General Interview Gui
Page 115 and 116: 114 Annex III:: Questionnaire www.i
show all

Transparency Initiative (EITI)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?