14.11.2016 Views

Transparency Initiative (EITI)

2eoch1l

2eoch1l

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

35<br />

tation against the <strong>EITI</strong> Standard.<br />

4. <strong>EITI</strong> Secretariat Reviews, produced occasionally as<br />

interim assessments pending Validation.<br />

<strong>EITI</strong> specific and <strong>EITI</strong> procedural aspects are found predominantly<br />

up to output level (covering inputs and activities).<br />

Key features are the:<br />

``<br />

``<br />

``<br />

``<br />

mandatory implementation of an international standard,<br />

which introduces innovations to national and local<br />

debates as it covers the entire decision making chain<br />

in the natural resource sector from licensing to revenue<br />

expenditure.<br />

multi-stakeholder governance model, which includes<br />

among other aspects:<br />

consensual decision making both within stakeholder<br />

groups, e.g. between government departments and government<br />

levels like central/federal and local levels, and<br />

between stakeholder groups, e.g. companies and civil<br />

society organizations.<br />

collective action, which leads to protected space for individuals<br />

and entities in government, companies and<br />

civil society in which critical issues can be addressed,<br />

e.g. political taboos, corruption concerns.<br />

Activities include the following aspects:<br />

1. MSG established.<br />

2. Key stakeholders capacitated.<br />

3. EI framework conditions monitored.<br />

4. Payments reported, reconciliated and disclosed.<br />

5. EI decision chain information disclosed<br />

(e.g. on licensing).<br />

6. Reform processes of the state and for businesses<br />

identified, facilitated and driven by the <strong>EITI</strong>.<br />

Inputs can be summarized as follows:<br />

1. Decisions by the International <strong>EITI</strong> Board to develop,<br />

adjust and enforce the Standard.<br />

2. Political will, services (e.g. preparing data) and financing<br />

(e.g. staff) provided by implementing governments, and<br />

key stakeholders (e.g. in MSG).<br />

3. Services by the International <strong>EITI</strong> Secretariat (e.g. advice,<br />

training, facilitation, research, platform for access<br />

to global open data: https://eiti.org/data).<br />

4. Services and financing by supporting governments,<br />

companies, NGOs, foundations, philanthropists, etc.<br />

(e.g. advice, training, facilitation, research).<br />

5. Research results from academia.<br />

For indicators and variables, and a description of the conditions<br />

that are conducive or obstructive to achieve results,<br />

please see the respective columns in the detailed version.<br />

Objectively verifiable indicators are essential to measure<br />

the benefits to <strong>EITI</strong> stakeholders. They should satisfy internationally<br />

recognized quality criteria (e.g. SMART), however,<br />

they cannot be articulated SMART on a generic level<br />

as they need to catch all contexts. In particular, the same<br />

sources of verification are not given in each country. Sources<br />

of verification of the indicators should be available at<br />

no or little cost to the the <strong>EITI</strong> stakeholders, in order not<br />

to promote a stand-alone approach of <strong>EITI</strong>, but to mainstream<br />

the initiative in governmental and industry processes.<br />

The following special fields of change cannot be adequately<br />

represented in the model:<br />

``<br />

``<br />

International coordination in the field of good governance<br />

in the extractives sector in terms of the G7 lead<br />

for a global level-playing-field, with regards to supply<br />

chain security, fiscal transparency, anti-corruption, Domestic<br />

Resource Mobilization (DRM), etc. A survey of<br />

<strong>EITI</strong> implementation in G7, EU and OECD has shown<br />

that the primary objective of industrialized countries<br />

to opt for domestic implementation is to encourage<br />

“good practice in developing and emerging countries<br />

(especially in relation to good governance, anti-corruption<br />

measures and a level playing field for the private<br />

sector).” Out of this group of countries, only the USA<br />

links <strong>EITI</strong> implementation specifically with its domestic<br />

open government initiatives, the link between implementation<br />

on the one hand and domestic political<br />

objectives and reforms on the other is marginal in all<br />

other cases. Besides the USA, the <strong>EITI</strong> is also linked to<br />

the Open Government Partnership (OGP) in Germany,<br />

Norway and the United Kingdom. “For the most part,<br />

the objectives derived from the work plans are limited<br />

to technical issues concerning viability, reporting and<br />

public relations.” (D-<strong>EITI</strong> 2015: 4).<br />

Government internal communication and cooperation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!