Transparency Initiative (EITI)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

75 EITI Standard and published on December 31, 2015. The next M-EITI validation is planned for January 2017. FIGURE 8: M-EITI IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE MOZAMBIQUE Last updated Januara 2016 Government announces commitment Validation report submitted Candidature application Submitted MSG formed Becomes Candidate country Board declares "meaningful progress" Secretariat review Designated Compliant country Reporting extension requested Deadline for next Validation Deadline for next EITI Report 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2012 EITI Report shows capital tax contributed 43% 2017 2018 2013-14 EITI Report published 2008 EITI Report published 2011 EITI Report shows increase in oil and gas revenues 2010 EITI Report includes 2009 overview of tax regime EITI Report published Source: eiti.org
76 Case Study: Mozambique A small Mozambican EITI Secretariat was established in early 2009 and is currently hosted in the World Bank’s Mining and Gas Technical Assistance Project (MAGTAP) offices in Maputo. The Secretariat has four staff members, comprising an Executive Secretary (National Coordinator), a Manager of Institutional Relations and Procurement, an accountant, and a driver. The M-EITI multi-stakeholder group (MSG) consists of 14 members and 11 alternates with representatives from the government, i.e. the Ministry of Mineral Resources and Energy (MIREME), Ministry of Economy and Finance, Ministry of Land, Environment and Rural Development (MITA- DE), four private sector companies from both the mining and petroleum sectors, four civil society organizations (CSOs) nominated from the CSO platform on extractive industries, and two observers, one from the Geological Mining Association of Mozambique and another from the National Syndicate of Journalists. The MSG does not comprise any members from the Mozambican Parliament. The M-EI- TI MSG meets on a quarterly basis and is currently chaired by the Advisor to the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy. 2. Improve accountability mechanisms for public and private companies in the extractive sector. 3. Clarify and disseminate the allocation of receipts’ mechanisms for the development of affected communities. 4. Strengthen the role and intervention of the M-EITI’s MSG in monitoring and access to information with a view to effective public participation in extractive industry good governance. 5. Improve transparency in the license granting process. 6. Contribute to improvement of the business environment in the extractive sector. Work plan implementation: EITI implementation in Mozambique is guided by the M-EITI work plan, which seeks to deal with the new challenging requirements defined by the EITI Standard. Previous work plans did not set out specific objectives, but the current three-year plan is significantly more elaborate in that country specific objectives have been clearly defined, presenting to the public what the initiative aims to achieve in terms of good governance of the extractive sectors between 2016 and 2018 and how it intends to attain these objectives. More specifically, the new work plan for M-EITI includes clear objectives, rationales behind these, activities that will help achieve the stated objectives, expected results, responsible parties, timeframe, cost, and funding source. The 2016-2018 work plan was developed by the MSG during a 2.5-day participatory workshop facilitated by the GIZ and the International EITI Secretariat. It is the intention that the work plan will be revised on an annual basis. However, in terms of focusing on results, the work plan does not distinguish between outputs, outcomes, and impacts and no indicators have yet been identified for monitoring the progress of EITI implementation on an annual basis. These aspects have now been captured in the proposed M-EITI results model. THE WORK PLAN IDENTIFIES SIX OBJECTIVES TO BE ACHIEVED BY M-EITI OVER THE PERIOD 2016-2018: 1. Ensure access to information, with a view to an effective and informed public participation in public debate on extractive resources governance.
Page 1 and 2:
Assessing the Effectiveness and Imp
Page 3 and 4:
2 Content ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINIT
Page 5 and 6:
4 Abbreviations and definitions ABB
Page 7 and 8:
6 Requirements The seven requiremen
Page 9 and 10:
8 Executive summary This study asse
Page 11 and 12:
10 Executive summary 15. High(er) e
Page 13 and 14:
12 Executive summary COOPERATION 5.
Page 15 and 16:
14 Introduction 2.1 ABOUT THE EITI
Page 17 and 18:
16 Introduction FIGURE 1: VISUALIZI
Page 19 and 20:
18 Introduction 2.2 THE ROLE OF GER
Page 21 and 22:
20 Introduction 2.4 STRUCTURE OF TH
Page 23 and 24:
22 Methodology There is a notable a
Page 25 and 26: 24 Methodology 3.2 MACRO DATA: GLOB
Page 27 and 28: 26 Methodology 3.3 CASE STUDIES: CO
Page 29 and 30: 28 Methodology FIGURE 2: RESPONDENT
Page 31 and 32: 30 Methodology
Page 33 and 34: 32 Generic Results Model 4. GENERIC
Page 35 and 36: 34 Generic Results Model Outcome: T
Page 37 and 38: 36 Generic Results Model (between m
Page 39: 38 Generic Results Model 39 Levels
Page 42 and 43: 41 5. LITERATURE REVIEW
Page 44 and 45: 43 the report leaves unclear what k
Page 46 and 47: 45 5.2.1 FISCAL TRANSPARENCY `` A n
Page 48 and 49: 47 5.2.3 ANTI-CORRUPTION es members
Page 50 and 51: 49 5.2.4 TRADE AND INVESTMENT CLIMA
Page 52 and 53: 51 6. MACRO DATA: GLOBAL STATISTICA
Page 54 and 55: 53 from the analysis are quite sobe
Page 56 and 57: 55 7. OPEN ONLINE SURVEY
Page 58 and 59: 57 FIGURE 5: IMPACTS OF EITI ∙ No
Page 60 and 61: 59 8. CASE STUDY: DEMOCRATIC REPUBL
Page 62 and 63: 61 FIGURE 7: DRC’S PATH TO EITI C
Page 64 and 65: 63 8.2 RESULTS MODEL Given the incr
Page 66 and 67: 65 Levels Areas Indicators (in addi
Page 68 and 69: 67 8.3.1 FISCAL TRANSPARENCY The EI
Page 70 and 71: 69 The EITI’s effectiveness is co
Page 72 and 73: 71 8.4 CONCLUSION Although the DRC
Page 74 and 75: 73 9. CASE STUDY: MOZAMBIQUE
Page 78 and 79: 77 9.2 RESULTS MODEL To shed light
Page 80 and 81: 79 Fiscal transparency and accounta
Page 82 and 83: 81 9.3.2 PUBLIC DEBATE 9.3.3 ANTI-C
Page 84 and 85: 83 9.4 CONCLUSION Effects of the M-
Page 86 and 87: 85 10. CONCLUSIONS
Page 88 and 89: 87 to what degree EITI processes on
Page 90 and 91: 89 where transparency can lead to r
Page 92 and 93: 91 11. RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 94 and 95: 93 periods of time. Probably a pane
Page 96 and 97: 95 12. DOCUMENTS
Page 98 and 99: 97 Transparency Initiative. Corpora
Page 100 and 101: 99 Holland, Jeremy and Thirkell, Al
Page 102 and 103: ANNEX I: EITI REQUIREMENT 7 - OUTCO
Page 104 and 105: 103 b. Summarise and compare the sh
Page 106 and 107: ANNEX II: GENERAL INTERVIEW GUIDELI
Page 109: 108 Annes II: General Interview Gui
Page 113 and 114: 112 Annes II: General Interview Gui
Page 115 and 116: 114 Annex III:: Questionnaire www.i
show all

Transparency Initiative (EITI)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?