14.11.2016 Views

Transparency Initiative (EITI)

2eoch1l

2eoch1l

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

77<br />

9.2 RESULTS MODEL<br />

To shed light on the links between activities of M-<strong>EITI</strong> towards<br />

improved transparency, accountability, and aggregated<br />

impacts, the reconstruction of the theory of change<br />

started with an analysis of the MSG’s work plan. The 2013-<br />

2015 work plan sets this goal for M-<strong>EITI</strong>: ‘Promote and<br />

strengthen good governance through transparency, accountability,<br />

participation and sustainable exploration of<br />

extractive resources’, with objectives that are procedural in<br />

nature leading to producing a comprehensive report, accompanied<br />

with training and communication activities.<br />

The second part of the goal, ‘sustainable exploration of extractive<br />

resources’ was not clearly defined and it is not clear<br />

what processes will guarantee its compliance. The 2016-<br />

2018 work plan appears to be a much better structured plan<br />

with clear objectives and a path to achieve them, but it does<br />

not make a distinction between outputs and outcomes and<br />

is lacking outcome indicators for adequate monitoring. Finally,<br />

a couple of areas that are not adequately covered in<br />

the M-<strong>EITI</strong> work plan have been discussed in the course of<br />

the study and included in the results model. These areas are<br />

local content and revenue redistribution (current and for<br />

future generations).<br />

COUNTRY-SPECIFIC RESULTS MODEL (DRAFT IN PROGRESS AS<br />

DISCUSSED WITH MSG MEMBERS IN JULY 2016)<br />

Levels Areas Indicators<br />

(in addition to the ones listed in the generic<br />

model)<br />

Conditions<br />

(conducive/obstructive)<br />

Highly<br />

aggregated<br />

impact<br />

Sustainable development in<br />

Mozambique<br />

• Poverty reduction<br />

• Economic diversification<br />

• Economic growth<br />

1. USD X income per capita<br />

2. USD X income per capita in regions of EI<br />

influence.<br />

3. X% of population below the poverty level<br />

4. GINI coefficient<br />

Same as in generic model.<br />

Specifically:<br />

1. Political will to establish<br />

a peaceful solution<br />

to conflict.<br />

2. Macroeconomic conditions<br />

substantially improved<br />

with a sound<br />

fiscal program accepted<br />

by IMF and donors implemented.<br />

3. Capacity of key government<br />

agencies to manage<br />

the EI sector – including<br />

monitoring of<br />

contracts – improved.<br />

4. Favorable fiscal terms.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!