14.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JBTM Book Reviews<br />

153<br />

“right” view. He contends that “the loss of false confidence can be the occasion for new<br />

discovery and, when shared with others, new opportunity for mutual understanding” (390).<br />

Readers would do well to read critically though, as Elliot also reprimands clergy members who<br />

fail to denounce Pauline passages that do not promote egalitarianism. Barbara R. Rossing’s<br />

insightful essay on Revelation also bears mention. She recommends reading the difficult text<br />

through the lens of its original audience, the marginalized. At the same time, she advocates<br />

a “hermeneutic of hope” that is appropriate for both the original audience and for modern<br />

readers.<br />

A congenial tone pervades the book as contributors present conclusions judiciously and<br />

use questions frequently to encourage thought and introspection. For example, in relation to<br />

Mark 7, Raquel S. Lettsome asks, “What are the pollutants that we fear in our contemporary<br />

practice of the faith?” (194), and in relation to Acts 1 Demetrius K. Williams queries, “Should<br />

an ancient narrative be a contemporary imperative?” (331). Regardless of how one answers<br />

such questions, the volume reminds readers that the Bible is still living and active, relevant<br />

and effectual.<br />

To conclude, this resource is an excellent contribution to New Testament scholarship<br />

when evaluated with a critical mindset. Readers are exposed to a multiplicity of perspectives<br />

on the biblical text, both past and present. Moreover, the three-tiered format familiarizes<br />

readers with the interpretive strategies of the early church, patristic scholars, and modern<br />

exegetes. As contributors encourage readers to engage with the texts both lay persons and<br />

clergy will find much to contemplate in Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The New Testament.<br />

- Andrea L. Robinson, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, New Orleans, Louisiana<br />

Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The Old Testament and Apocrypha. Edited by Gale A.<br />

Yee, Hugh R. Page Jr., and Matthew J. M. Coomber. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015. 1050<br />

pages. Hardcover, $49.00.<br />

The Fortress Commentary on the Bible is a two-volume compendium that “seeks to invite<br />

study and conversation about an ancient text that is both complex and compelling” (1). The<br />

editors share in a desire to help students understand the rich contexts from which the Bible<br />

arose. Therefore, the commentary is intended as a resource to enable general readers to<br />

engage in contemporary discussions about the legacy of the Bible and grapple with possible<br />

meanings “as active interpreters in their own right” (1). The current review will evaluate the<br />

first volume, which treats the Old Testament and Apocrypha.<br />

The structure of the commentary is an outgrowth of its purpose. Following a brief<br />

introduction, the first chapter provides information on the ancient and modern context of<br />

the Bible, as well as an overview of interpretive methodologies. The following two chapters,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!