(Part 1)
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JBTM Book Reviews<br />
153<br />
“right” view. He contends that “the loss of false confidence can be the occasion for new<br />
discovery and, when shared with others, new opportunity for mutual understanding” (390).<br />
Readers would do well to read critically though, as Elliot also reprimands clergy members who<br />
fail to denounce Pauline passages that do not promote egalitarianism. Barbara R. Rossing’s<br />
insightful essay on Revelation also bears mention. She recommends reading the difficult text<br />
through the lens of its original audience, the marginalized. At the same time, she advocates<br />
a “hermeneutic of hope” that is appropriate for both the original audience and for modern<br />
readers.<br />
A congenial tone pervades the book as contributors present conclusions judiciously and<br />
use questions frequently to encourage thought and introspection. For example, in relation to<br />
Mark 7, Raquel S. Lettsome asks, “What are the pollutants that we fear in our contemporary<br />
practice of the faith?” (194), and in relation to Acts 1 Demetrius K. Williams queries, “Should<br />
an ancient narrative be a contemporary imperative?” (331). Regardless of how one answers<br />
such questions, the volume reminds readers that the Bible is still living and active, relevant<br />
and effectual.<br />
To conclude, this resource is an excellent contribution to New Testament scholarship<br />
when evaluated with a critical mindset. Readers are exposed to a multiplicity of perspectives<br />
on the biblical text, both past and present. Moreover, the three-tiered format familiarizes<br />
readers with the interpretive strategies of the early church, patristic scholars, and modern<br />
exegetes. As contributors encourage readers to engage with the texts both lay persons and<br />
clergy will find much to contemplate in Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The New Testament.<br />
- Andrea L. Robinson, New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary, New Orleans, Louisiana<br />
Fortress Commentary on the Bible: The Old Testament and Apocrypha. Edited by Gale A.<br />
Yee, Hugh R. Page Jr., and Matthew J. M. Coomber. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2015. 1050<br />
pages. Hardcover, $49.00.<br />
The Fortress Commentary on the Bible is a two-volume compendium that “seeks to invite<br />
study and conversation about an ancient text that is both complex and compelling” (1). The<br />
editors share in a desire to help students understand the rich contexts from which the Bible<br />
arose. Therefore, the commentary is intended as a resource to enable general readers to<br />
engage in contemporary discussions about the legacy of the Bible and grapple with possible<br />
meanings “as active interpreters in their own right” (1). The current review will evaluate the<br />
first volume, which treats the Old Testament and Apocrypha.<br />
The structure of the commentary is an outgrowth of its purpose. Following a brief<br />
introduction, the first chapter provides information on the ancient and modern context of<br />
the Bible, as well as an overview of interpretive methodologies. The following two chapters,