14.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JBTM Paul D. Wegner<br />

90<br />

(1QpHab), dated to the latter half of the first century BC, uses a pesher hermeneutic to<br />

apply the biblical text to their time period. First a portion of the Hebrew text is given (e.g.,<br />

Hab 1:4bc: “And justice does not emerge as the winner, for the evildoer accosts the upright<br />

man”), then it had the word pesher (Lit. “its interpretation”) followed by an interpretation<br />

and a direct application of the Hebrew text to their time (e.g., “the evildoer is the Wicked<br />

Priest and the upright man is the Teacher of Righteousness”). 2<br />

We would argue that these types of hermeneutics are not valid to use unless a passage<br />

specifically claims to employ these forms; for example, Paul states that he makes use of an<br />

allegory in Gal 4:24 and a type in Rom 5:14, but these are rare occasions. The far better way<br />

to bring over the application of OT texts to people today is by finding “timeless principles”<br />

that carry over into our historical context.<br />

Google dictionary defines a principle as “a fundamental truth or proposition that<br />

serves as the foundation for a system of belief or behavior or for a chain of reasoning.” 3 If<br />

a principle is a “fundamental truth or proposition,” then it will likely be just as true in the<br />

OT time period as it is today. Our goal, then, in applying the OT is to bring out timeless<br />

principles that are true throughout history. Walter C. Kaiser says it like this: “The interpreter<br />

of the Bible is not only responsible to comment on the truth-assertions or meanings of the<br />

human author of Scripture (who after all was the one who stood in the counsel of God<br />

to obtain his revelation in the first place), but the interpreter must also go on to derive<br />

textually authenticated principles from those same Biblical texts.” 4 We agree with Kaiser<br />

that these principles can only be truly authoritative for us today if they are grounded in the<br />

meaning of the text and it is equally true that we cannot simply teach what an OT passage<br />

is saying without finding legitimate principles therein that apply to us today. Both aspects<br />

are crucial for biblical preaching. If we only do the former and teach only what the prophet<br />

had to say to the people of his time, we will have dry, dusty history that has little application<br />

to modern life. And if we only do the latter, we will have motivational speaking with little<br />

authority from God’s word. We can achieve a careful balance between the meaning of the<br />

prophetical narrative and an insightful application that brings Scripture to bear on our lives<br />

by utilizing the fundamental principles of biblical hermeneutics.<br />

²See Florentino García Martínez, The Dead Sea Scrolls Translated, trans. W. G. E. Watson (Leiden:<br />

Brill, 1994), 198.<br />

³“Principle,”accessedJune29,2015,https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chromeinstant&rlz=1C1GGGE_enUS620US620&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#q=principle.<br />

⁴Walter C. Kaiser, Jr., “The Principlizing Method,” n.p. (cited 29 June 2015). Online: http://<br />

zondervanacademic.com/blog/moving_beyond/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!