(Part 1)
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JBTM Book Reviews<br />
179<br />
Systematic Theology. By Anthony C. Thiselton. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015. 467<br />
Pages. Hardcover, $40.00.<br />
Anthony C. Thiselton is professor emeritus of Christian theology at the University of<br />
Nottingham, England. He holds degrees from King’s College London (BD, MTh), the University<br />
of Sheffield (PhD), and the University of Durham (DD). He has written multiple works in the<br />
fields of hermeneutics, Christian theology, biblical studies, and the philosophy of religion.<br />
His other works include The Two Horizons: New Testament Hermeneutics and Philosophical<br />
Description, New Horizons in Hermeneutics: The Theory and Practice of Transforming Biblical<br />
Reading, The First Epistle to the Corinthians: A Commentary on the Greek Text, The Hermeneutics<br />
of Doctrine, and The Holy Spirit: In Biblical Teaching Through the Centuries and Today.<br />
After a long career of writing in the disciplines of hermeneutics, theology, and biblical<br />
studies, Anthony Thiselton has provided a systematic theology. Though it is only 467 pages,<br />
readers should not underestimate the amount of information contained in this volume. In<br />
his Systematic Theology, Thiselton discusses the classic topics of Christian theology as well as<br />
some unique topics of theological method.<br />
Thiselton begins his Systematic Theology by addressing issues of theological prolegomena.<br />
He notes the necessity for coherence in systematic theology and addresses objections to<br />
“system.” He is skeptical of some correspondence theories of truth and appropriates a<br />
coherence theory for his work. Thiselton does not deny the claim that truth is that which<br />
corresponds to reality. Rather, he notes that in epistemological issues such as those in<br />
systematic theology, one has to rely primarily on tests of coherence. Also, theology must<br />
deal with the Bible in its historical context, rather than using the Bible as a set of prooftexts.<br />
Furthermore, Thiselton deals with issues concerning conceptual grammar as well as<br />
the usefulness of developments in speech-act theory, hermeneutics, sociology, and literary<br />
theory for systematic theology.<br />
Thiselton divides his doctrine of God into two chapters. The first of these two discusses<br />
God’s personhood, the Trinity, and God’s holy love and grace. He notes that God is personal,<br />
but not in the same way that humans are personal. Thiselton prefers to describe God as<br />
“suprapersonal.” Thiselton states, “God is more than a person but not less than a person” (30).<br />
He affirms that God exists as Trinity, noting the implications of his being suprapersonal,<br />
namely that God is not “three human like persons” (32). He prefers to explain God’s<br />
existence as Trinity in terms of the realtionality among the three members. Thiselton also<br />
prefers to understand God as the dynamic, “living God” rather than the static, immutable<br />
God of theism. Thiselton does not deny theism understood as adherence to the belief in one<br />
God who relates to the world in a suprapersonal way (40). He summarizes the theism he<br />
denounces as follows: “But ‘theism’ can also be more abstract, static, and theoretical than<br />
belief in the living God of the Bible, and especially the God of the OT. . . . (T)heism seeks<br />
to know God through his being, while faith in the living God knows God from his activity”