14.11.2016 Views

(Part 1)

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JBTM Jeffrey G. Audirsch<br />

55<br />

ancient Israel’s interaction with God and the surrounding nations. It includes<br />

multiple theologies from various traditions and it describes elements of<br />

worship that are foreign to modern readers. Thus, it is imperative that the<br />

interpreter/preacher be fluent in the major themes, theological motifs, and<br />

historical events of ancient Israel.<br />

5. Identify the historical background/context. Every biblical text has a context.<br />

The task of the interpreter/preacher is to identify—through various means<br />

sometimes—the most probable context of a given passage. In some cases,<br />

identifying the historical background/context of a poem is easy (e.g., the<br />

Song of Hannah in 1 Sam 2:1–1). At other times, especially in the Psalter,<br />

the historical background/context is not easily identifiable. When dealing<br />

with the Psalter, this principle should include more practical questions:<br />

What type of psalm is it? What is the purpose of the psalm (particularly<br />

with regard to its type)? Who is speaking? Is the psalm evoking a response<br />

from an individual, a group, or both? In these cases, the interpreter/preacher<br />

should rely on various introductory books and commentaries to assist in the<br />

process. Additionally, it will be greatly beneficial if interpreters/preachers<br />

are familiar with both Noth’s and Westermann’s approaches to classification<br />

of the psalms (see above).<br />

From a preaching point of view, interpreters/preachers can preach a poetic<br />

text from two perspectives. Either focus on the meaning of the poetic text<br />

or focus should be on what is behind the poetic text. Both approaches are<br />

valuable. Naturally, a blend of the two can be done as well. The difference<br />

between the two approaches is significant. The focus on the meaning of the<br />

text approach is more concerned with the emotive purpose of the song/hymn<br />

over and against the back story (i.e., historical background/context) of the<br />

other approach. In short, focus on the meaning of the poetic text approach<br />

tries to avoid preaching the back story of a poem/psalm by focusing mainly<br />

on “the meaning of the text.” 92 For example, most scholars agree that the<br />

historical background/context of Ps 51 is David’s affair with Bathsheba and<br />

the subsequent condemnation of the king by the prophet Nathan (2 Sam<br />

11–12). Thus, preaching from the meaning of the poetic text rather than the<br />

what is behind the text would mean that the interpreter/preaching would not<br />

focus on David’s moral failure described in the Samuel corpus, but rather on<br />

the emotive response of David to his sins.<br />

6. Identify the figurative and cultural-specific language. One of the greatest<br />

difficulties in preaching biblical poetry is trying to interpret and understand<br />

92<br />

Steven Smith, Recapturing the Voice of God (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 2015), 135–36.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!