(Part 1)
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
JBTM_13-2_Fall_2016
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
JBTM Book Reviews<br />
191<br />
The word “love” used in 1 Sam 1:26 to describe David’s love for Jonathan in also used in 1 Kgs<br />
10:9 to describe God’s love for Israel. The emphasis in not on latent sexual desires, but on<br />
covenant loyalty. Sprinkle borrows ideas from pro-homosexual deconstructions of the text<br />
in arguing that “same-sex attraction” as used in our culture is not analogous in any way to<br />
David’s friendship with Jonathan or Jesus and John. Sprinkle gives away too much and makes<br />
an analogy that does violence to the meaning of Scripture.<br />
Perhaps Sprinkle’s sloppy handling of Scripture in Gen 2:24–25, Ezek 16:49–50, and 1 Sam<br />
1:26 are all indicative of what I perceive to be the deepest hermeneutical problem in his<br />
work—namely, that he appears to be influenced by the postmodern idea that we can never<br />
arrive at a certain meaning for any given text. It is quite concerning to read this remark by<br />
Sprinkle about his current work: it “doesn’t represent my codified, unchangeable, etchedin-stone<br />
declaration of what I have and always will believe about homosexuality” (PTBL,<br />
11). While it is certainly true that we can always improve the way we apply biblical truth,<br />
Sprinkle seems to indicate that we cannot assert concretely the truth in the text. Perhaps this<br />
is merely poor wording. But it seems as if Sprinkle at least gives some credence to the idea<br />
that objective inquiry is not possible.<br />
People who experience same-sex attraction are certainly people to be loved, and it is<br />
painfully evident that men and women with such temptations have sometimes encountered<br />
unhelpful attitudes among Christians. But it is also painfully evident that revisionist<br />
interpretations of Scripture often abuse the intent of the original text in order to circumvent<br />
the clear Scriptural teaching. Sprinkle is to be applauded for the texts he handles with<br />
care (Rom 1:18–32; 1 Cor 6:9–11), but the degree to which revisionist interpretations have<br />
influenced his handling of other texts is cause for concern.<br />
- J. Alan Branch, Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, Kansas City, Missouri