15.12.2016 Views

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Monitoring Shadow Banking Risks<br />

The 2007-09 financial crisis was so devastating in part because companies and<br />

regulators didn’t recognize the risks as activities migrated from banks to new,<br />

typically less transparent, and presumably less resilient markets and institutions.<br />

Since then, the term “shadow banking” has often been used to describe the<br />

extension of credit by nonbank companies, or credit funded by liabilities that<br />

are susceptible to runs because they are payable on demand and lack any government<br />

backstop.<br />

Shadow banking is still a key source of credit and financial services in the United<br />

States. Understanding the incentives that drive these activities and the potential<br />

risks and vulnerabilities they may create for financial stability is central to the<br />

<strong>OFR</strong>’s work. We are focused on (1) run risks in money market funds and similar<br />

vehicles, (2) run risks and fire-sale risks in secured funding markets, and (3) credit<br />

risk for nonbank credit providers.<br />

Run risks in money market funds and similar vehicles. Runs on prime money<br />

market funds in September 2008 made the financial crisis more severe. A recent<br />

SEC rule addresses this risk. The rule requires prime and tax-exempt money<br />

market funds with institutional investors to let their net asset values float with<br />

the value of the assets they hold. Prime and tax-exempt funds with retail investors<br />

may continue to offer a stable net asset value — that is, these funds may<br />

be sold and redeemed at a $1 share price. Even then, these funds will have<br />

to report the market value of their share prices. Both types of funds will have<br />

to adopt liquidity fees and redemption restrictions, though these can be suspended<br />

by each fund’s board. In anticipation of this rule, which took effect on<br />

Oct. 14, <strong>2016</strong>, $1 trillion shifted from prime funds to government funds (see<br />

Figure 13) (see Schreft, <strong>2016</strong>).<br />

We are focused on<br />

(1) run risks in money<br />

market funds and similar<br />

vehicles, (2) run risks and<br />

fire-sale risks in secured<br />

funding markets, and (3)<br />

credit risk for nonbank<br />

credit providers.<br />

In July, the <strong>OFR</strong> launched our U.S. Money Market Fund Monitor, an online<br />

interactive tool that regulators and others can use to explore and display fund<br />

investments. It relies on data the funds now file on the SEC’s Form N-MFP (see<br />

Baklanova and Stemp, <strong>2016</strong>).<br />

Similar short-term investment vehicles can be subject to runs. Some of these<br />

vehicles report a stable net asset value, although they take credit risks and have<br />

no government backstop. These include retail prime and tax-exempt money<br />

market funds, some short-term investment funds sponsored by banks, some<br />

local government investment pools, and some private liquidity funds. Data are<br />

relatively new for some of these vehicles, so not all are included in the series in<br />

Figure 16.<br />

<strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> Assessment 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!