15.12.2016 Views

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

could. In early <strong>2016</strong>, investor concerns focused on European banks’ earnings<br />

and loan quality. Further weaknesses in European banks could have<br />

repercussions on U.S. financial stability and the economy (see Risks for<br />

European Banks Remain High).<br />

In this section, we consider how potential spillovers from Europe could<br />

affect U.S. banks, insurers, asset managers, and money market funds. Due<br />

to the magnitude of both direct and indirect exposures, the potential impact<br />

of more disruptions in Europe on U.S. financial stability is high. The probability<br />

is difficult to judge, although it seems likely that uncertainty will persist<br />

for some time. The immediacy of the issue is moderate. It is unclear how<br />

prepared regulators and firms are for further disruptions, especially given<br />

the unprecedented nature of a country voting to exit the EU after 43 years<br />

of membership. U.S. supervisors should continue to monitor and stress test<br />

financial exposures.<br />

Figure 21. Total Exposures of U.S. G-SIBs to the EU<br />

($ billions)<br />

Off-balance-sheet items are a significant portion of U.S.<br />

G-SIB exposure to the European Union<br />

Cross-border claims<br />

Claims on local residents<br />

Fair value of derivatives<br />

Unused commitments<br />

Guarantees<br />

Credit derivatives sold<br />

On-balance-sheet items<br />

Off-balance-sheet items<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000<br />

Note: Data as of June 30, <strong>2016</strong>. G-SIB stands for global<br />

systemically important bank. Claims are on an ultimate risk basis<br />

and include the reallocation of claims such as risk transfers.<br />

Croatia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, and Slovenia are not<br />

represented in this sample.<br />

Sources: Federal <strong>Financial</strong> Institutions Examination Council, <strong>OFR</strong><br />

analysis<br />

U.S. <strong>Financial</strong> Institutions Have Large<br />

Direct Exposures to Europe<br />

Banks. U.S. global systemically important banks<br />

(G-SIBs) have more than $2 trillion in total exposures<br />

to Europe (see Figure 21). Roughly half of those exposures<br />

are off-balance-sheet. Under stress, U.S. G-SIBs’<br />

unused commitments could be drawn, straining the<br />

liquidity and capital of these firms. U.S. G-SIBs have<br />

sold more than $800 billion notional in credit derivatives<br />

referencing entities domiciled in the EU.<br />

The Brexit vote raised locational and supervisory<br />

risks for large internationally active banks. It has<br />

led many banks to consider moving operations out of<br />

London. The alternatives are unclear and possibly more<br />

expensive.<br />

Insurance companies. U.S. insurance companies are<br />

exposed to the EU through investments, derivatives,<br />

and reinsurance. The top 10 U.S. life insurers have $32<br />

billion of investment exposure to Europe, excluding the<br />

United Kingdom.<br />

Gross notional derivatives exposure to EU banks<br />

totaled $311 billion for the top 10 U.S. life insurers<br />

at the end of 2015. Notional exposures may overstate<br />

the potential risks of derivatives. But data on notional<br />

exposures also may understate U.S. insurers’ links to<br />

European banks. For example, American International<br />

Group, Inc. (AIG) and Prudential use noninsurance<br />

24 <strong>2016</strong> | <strong>OFR</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!