15.12.2016 Views

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The experience of Japan’s life insurers during the late 1990s is informative<br />

(see Low Interest Rates and Declining Equity Prices Drove Failures of<br />

Japanese Life Insurers). European regulators also ran a stress test of their<br />

insurers in 2014 that included a low-rate scenario. The results showed that<br />

roughly one quarter of European Union (EU) insurers would have trouble<br />

meeting their obligations to policyholders in 8 to 11 years. Importantly,<br />

the scenario assumed interest rates well above those currently prevailing in<br />

Europe. The stress test also included a more severe scenario that assumed<br />

low rates and falling asset prices. In that scenario, 44 percent of EU insurers<br />

would not have enough capital (see EIOPA, 2014). European regulators are<br />

running another stress test this year. U.S. regulators need consolidated data<br />

to stress-test U.S. insurance companies to evaluate the impact of falling asset<br />

prices while interest rates remain low.<br />

Low Interest Rates and Declining Equity Prices Drove Failures of Japanese<br />

Life Insurers<br />

Japanese life insurers have been dealing with low interest<br />

rates and declining equity markets for two decades. Their<br />

experience may offer a window into the future of the U.S.<br />

life insurance industry.<br />

Seven Japanese life insurers failed from 1997 to 2001<br />

(see Figure 52) (see Kobayashi, 2014). These failed firms<br />

accounted for about 10 percent of the industry’s assets<br />

(see A.M. Best, <strong>2016</strong>). The 1997 life insurer failure was the<br />

first in Japan in more than 50 years (see Yamashita and<br />

Finnegan, 1997). That failure at first was considered an<br />

isolated event, unlikely to be followed by more failures.<br />

As other insurers failed, though, policyholders withdrew<br />

money to avoid losses.<br />

Figure 52. Failures of Japanese Life Insurance<br />

Companies (assets in trillion of yen)<br />

Seven life insurers failed in Japan between 1997 and 2001<br />

Company Date of Failure Assets<br />

Nissan Mutual April 1997 ¥1.8 trillion<br />

Toho Mutual June 1999 ¥2.2 trillion<br />

Daihyaku Mutual May 2000 ¥1.3 trillion<br />

Taisho Life August 2000 ¥0.2 trillion<br />

Chiyoda Mutual October 2000 ¥2.2 trillion<br />

Kyoei Life October 2000 ¥3.7 trillion<br />

Tokyo Mutual March 2001 ¥0.7 trillion<br />

Low rates and declining asset prices squeezed Japanese<br />

life insurers’ net interest margins. Margins turned negative.<br />

Some insurers paid more to policyholders than they<br />

earned on supporting assets. To stabilize the industry,<br />

Japan’s government took several actions. A voluntary<br />

industry guaranty fund was created, then a mandatory<br />

guaranty fund. Ultimately, the Japanese government<br />

announced up to ¥400 billion ($4 billion) in government-guaranteed<br />

loans the Bank of Japan could extend<br />

Total<br />

Note: Assets are as of date of failure.<br />

Source: The Geneva Association<br />

¥12.1 trillion<br />

60 <strong>2016</strong> | <strong>OFR</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!