OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The experience of Japan’s life insurers during the late 1990s is informative<br />
(see Low Interest Rates and Declining Equity Prices Drove Failures of<br />
Japanese Life Insurers). European regulators also ran a stress test of their<br />
insurers in 2014 that included a low-rate scenario. The results showed that<br />
roughly one quarter of European Union (EU) insurers would have trouble<br />
meeting their obligations to policyholders in 8 to 11 years. Importantly,<br />
the scenario assumed interest rates well above those currently prevailing in<br />
Europe. The stress test also included a more severe scenario that assumed<br />
low rates and falling asset prices. In that scenario, 44 percent of EU insurers<br />
would not have enough capital (see EIOPA, 2014). European regulators are<br />
running another stress test this year. U.S. regulators need consolidated data<br />
to stress-test U.S. insurance companies to evaluate the impact of falling asset<br />
prices while interest rates remain low.<br />
Low Interest Rates and Declining Equity Prices Drove Failures of Japanese<br />
Life Insurers<br />
Japanese life insurers have been dealing with low interest<br />
rates and declining equity markets for two decades. Their<br />
experience may offer a window into the future of the U.S.<br />
life insurance industry.<br />
Seven Japanese life insurers failed from 1997 to 2001<br />
(see Figure 52) (see Kobayashi, 2014). These failed firms<br />
accounted for about 10 percent of the industry’s assets<br />
(see A.M. Best, <strong>2016</strong>). The 1997 life insurer failure was the<br />
first in Japan in more than 50 years (see Yamashita and<br />
Finnegan, 1997). That failure at first was considered an<br />
isolated event, unlikely to be followed by more failures.<br />
As other insurers failed, though, policyholders withdrew<br />
money to avoid losses.<br />
Figure 52. Failures of Japanese Life Insurance<br />
Companies (assets in trillion of yen)<br />
Seven life insurers failed in Japan between 1997 and 2001<br />
Company Date of Failure Assets<br />
Nissan Mutual April 1997 ¥1.8 trillion<br />
Toho Mutual June 1999 ¥2.2 trillion<br />
Daihyaku Mutual May 2000 ¥1.3 trillion<br />
Taisho Life August 2000 ¥0.2 trillion<br />
Chiyoda Mutual October 2000 ¥2.2 trillion<br />
Kyoei Life October 2000 ¥3.7 trillion<br />
Tokyo Mutual March 2001 ¥0.7 trillion<br />
Low rates and declining asset prices squeezed Japanese<br />
life insurers’ net interest margins. Margins turned negative.<br />
Some insurers paid more to policyholders than they<br />
earned on supporting assets. To stabilize the industry,<br />
Japan’s government took several actions. A voluntary<br />
industry guaranty fund was created, then a mandatory<br />
guaranty fund. Ultimately, the Japanese government<br />
announced up to ¥400 billion ($4 billion) in government-guaranteed<br />
loans the Bank of Japan could extend<br />
Total<br />
Note: Assets are as of date of failure.<br />
Source: The Geneva Association<br />
¥12.1 trillion<br />
60 <strong>2016</strong> | <strong>OFR</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>