15.12.2016 Views

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.4 Central Counterparties as Contagion<br />

Channels<br />

The growing role of central counterparties (CCPs) in financial markets<br />

will improve market efficiency, transparency, and financial stability,<br />

but will also concentrate risks. Distress at a CCP could impose losses<br />

on its clearing members, which include the largest and most interconnected<br />

financial institutions. New public data releases and stress<br />

test results in <strong>2016</strong> shed light on the potential for a distressed CCP to<br />

transmit financial instability.<br />

Since the financial crisis, regulators across the world have worked to move<br />

derivatives from bilateral transactions to central clearing through CCPs. The<br />

use of CCPs promotes product standardization and greater transparency.<br />

The role of CCPs in clearing derivatives transactions has grown greatly<br />

since the crisis. About 75 percent of transactions in swap markets supervised<br />

by the CFTC are now centrally cleared. That is up from about 15 percent in<br />

2007 (see Massad, <strong>2016</strong>). Swaps markets now clear 97 percent of new trans -<br />

actions in forward rate agreements and 89 percent in fixed-float interest rate<br />

swaps (see CFTC, <strong>2016</strong>b).<br />

Derivatives CCPs reduce counterparty credit risk in over-the-counter<br />

(OTC) derivatives markets, reducing some of the financial stability risks of<br />

bilateral trading. CCPs could lower trading costs, improve price discovery,<br />

and reduce counterparty exposures through multilateral netting.<br />

However, in the process, CCPs will also concentrate counterparty<br />

default risk. For this reason, if not well managed, they may pose systemic<br />

risks. To address these risks, supervisors have coordinated and introduced<br />

international risk management standards for CCPs and other financial<br />

market infrastructures. As reliance on central clearing grows, the risk management<br />

practices and regulation of CCPs become more important. A CCP<br />

is vulnerable to the default of its clearing members. Clearing members<br />

are typically large and interconnected banks acting as dealers and clearing<br />

agents for many clients.<br />

CCPs manage risks through collateral requirements, membership standards,<br />

close surveillance of members, and legal procedures to address any<br />

default by clearing members. If CCP risk management proves inadequate, a<br />

distressed CCP may impose losses directly on remaining clearing members.<br />

A distressed CCP could also affect markets indirectly. Unwinding of portfolios<br />

as part of default management, either through auctions or liquidation,<br />

may aggravate price volatility.<br />

New data that CCPs across the world began disclosing this year provide<br />

insights about CCP risks. The data are useful for sizing up the effects of<br />

CCPs on financial stability. Still, gaps remain. European supervisors also<br />

Distress at a CCP could<br />

impose losses on its<br />

clearing members,<br />

which include the<br />

largest and most<br />

interconnected financial<br />

institutions. New public<br />

data releases and stress<br />

test results in <strong>2016</strong> shed<br />

light on the potential<br />

for a distressed CCP<br />

to transmit financial<br />

instability.<br />

Key Threats to <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!