OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2.4 Central Counterparties as Contagion<br />
Channels<br />
The growing role of central counterparties (CCPs) in financial markets<br />
will improve market efficiency, transparency, and financial stability,<br />
but will also concentrate risks. Distress at a CCP could impose losses<br />
on its clearing members, which include the largest and most interconnected<br />
financial institutions. New public data releases and stress<br />
test results in <strong>2016</strong> shed light on the potential for a distressed CCP to<br />
transmit financial instability.<br />
Since the financial crisis, regulators across the world have worked to move<br />
derivatives from bilateral transactions to central clearing through CCPs. The<br />
use of CCPs promotes product standardization and greater transparency.<br />
The role of CCPs in clearing derivatives transactions has grown greatly<br />
since the crisis. About 75 percent of transactions in swap markets supervised<br />
by the CFTC are now centrally cleared. That is up from about 15 percent in<br />
2007 (see Massad, <strong>2016</strong>). Swaps markets now clear 97 percent of new trans -<br />
actions in forward rate agreements and 89 percent in fixed-float interest rate<br />
swaps (see CFTC, <strong>2016</strong>b).<br />
Derivatives CCPs reduce counterparty credit risk in over-the-counter<br />
(OTC) derivatives markets, reducing some of the financial stability risks of<br />
bilateral trading. CCPs could lower trading costs, improve price discovery,<br />
and reduce counterparty exposures through multilateral netting.<br />
However, in the process, CCPs will also concentrate counterparty<br />
default risk. For this reason, if not well managed, they may pose systemic<br />
risks. To address these risks, supervisors have coordinated and introduced<br />
international risk management standards for CCPs and other financial<br />
market infrastructures. As reliance on central clearing grows, the risk management<br />
practices and regulation of CCPs become more important. A CCP<br />
is vulnerable to the default of its clearing members. Clearing members<br />
are typically large and interconnected banks acting as dealers and clearing<br />
agents for many clients.<br />
CCPs manage risks through collateral requirements, membership standards,<br />
close surveillance of members, and legal procedures to address any<br />
default by clearing members. If CCP risk management proves inadequate, a<br />
distressed CCP may impose losses directly on remaining clearing members.<br />
A distressed CCP could also affect markets indirectly. Unwinding of portfolios<br />
as part of default management, either through auctions or liquidation,<br />
may aggravate price volatility.<br />
New data that CCPs across the world began disclosing this year provide<br />
insights about CCP risks. The data are useful for sizing up the effects of<br />
CCPs on financial stability. Still, gaps remain. European supervisors also<br />
Distress at a CCP could<br />
impose losses on its<br />
clearing members,<br />
which include the<br />
largest and most<br />
interconnected financial<br />
institutions. New public<br />
data releases and stress<br />
test results in <strong>2016</strong> shed<br />
light on the potential<br />
for a distressed CCP<br />
to transmit financial<br />
instability.<br />
Key Threats to <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> 49