OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Better Regulatory Sharing Needed<br />
The ability to share data is constrained by legal concerns,<br />
difficulty in finding information on what data exist and<br />
who owns them, and the technical infrastructure needed<br />
to enable secure sharing.<br />
A lack of timely data sharing limited regulators’ ability<br />
to understand the risks building up before the financial<br />
crisis and to respond to rapidly changing events during<br />
the crisis. Data sharing is also essential for system-wide<br />
analysis that crosses markets and institutions overseen by<br />
different regulators.<br />
The December 2015 removal of the Dodd-Frank Act indemnification<br />
requirements from the Commodity Exchange<br />
Act and Securities Exchange Act has reduced the number<br />
of barriers to regulatory information sharing for certain<br />
derivatives data, but others remain. For example, regulators<br />
must successfully negotiate data-sharing memoranda<br />
of understanding to address confidentiality and the legal,<br />
policy, and operational constraints under which each regulator<br />
operates.<br />
The value of data sharing was demonstrated when regulators<br />
began analyzing an unprecedented surge of volatility<br />
in the U.S. Treasury market on Oct. 15, 2014. The analysis<br />
required collaboration among five U.S. regulators overseeing<br />
different parts of the market. A lack of comprehensive<br />
market data and initial challenges in sharing existing<br />
data across regulators slowed that analysis.<br />
Regulators took nine months to publish their final report<br />
on the event. With better technical infrastructure, appropriate<br />
agreements, and established practices for collaboration<br />
and data sharing, regulators could have more<br />
quickly assessed and addressed any underlying vulnerabilities.<br />
As these regulators develop new collections to<br />
fill data gaps, they also are developing an information<br />
sharing agreement (see Treasury, Board of Governors,<br />
FRBNY, SEC, and CFTC, 2015).<br />
needs that could be addressed by member agencies to<br />
ease sharing: “Data sharing improvements may include<br />
developing stronger data sharing agreements, collecting<br />
common data using standard methodologies, developing<br />
and linking together data inventories [metadata catalogs],<br />
and promoting standard criteria, protocols, and appropriately<br />
strong security controls to streamline secure sharing<br />
of datasets.” In support of the FSOC, the <strong>OFR</strong> is facilitating<br />
a working group to review data sharing agreements<br />
to identify areas that can be standardized.<br />
The <strong>OFR</strong> also is enhancing its own metadata catalog<br />
to add information and make nonconfidential portions<br />
viewable by other regulators and the public. A metadata<br />
catalog lists information about financial datasets, such as<br />
the names and definitions of data elements, who owns a<br />
dataset, and where it resides. The <strong>OFR</strong> plans to link the<br />
catalog to other agencies’ metadata catalogs. A reliable<br />
source of reference information such as linked metadata<br />
catalogs will support sharing.<br />
A lack of timely data sharing limited<br />
regulators’ ability to understand the<br />
risks building up before the financial<br />
crisis and to respond to rapidly<br />
changing events during the crisis.<br />
The FSOC stresses the importance of sharing data. The<br />
<strong>2016</strong> FSOC annual report emphasized basic operational<br />
82 <strong>2016</strong> | <strong>OFR</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> <strong>Report</strong>