15.12.2016 Views

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

OFR_2016_Financial-Stability-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

nearest second. The CFTC similarly requires one-second resolution for its<br />

real-time reporting. The SEC recently narrowed the measurement window<br />

to 50 milliseconds for OTC equities and securities in the National Market<br />

System (NMS) (see CFTC, <strong>2016</strong>a; FINRA, <strong>2016</strong>a).<br />

Securities markets typically give price-and-time priority to incoming<br />

transaction orders. Under the SEC’s Regulation NMS, for example, transactions<br />

data must be shared with the securities information processors who<br />

supply the National Best Bid or Offer to market data vendors at least as<br />

timely as with HFT machines receiving a direct feed (see SEC, 2005). Yet<br />

under current rules, time stamps on two trades that come in milliseconds<br />

apart could be mismeasured in ways that mask which one should have priority<br />

(see Figure 73).<br />

Technological limitations make<br />

it impossible to recover a true event<br />

time. For example, clock drift is<br />

the tendency of local clocks to<br />

run too slow or fast. Signal jitter<br />

is the unpredictable delay in a<br />

signal moving over long distances.<br />

Random disturbances like drift and<br />

jitter add unpredictable noise to the<br />

measured time stamp. In Figure<br />

73, the true event time, x*, precedes<br />

the true event time, y*, but<br />

the recorded times (measured with<br />

error) might be as large as x + or as<br />

small as y_, respectively. This combination<br />

of timestamps (x + and y_,)<br />

would create the misperception that<br />

y preceded x.<br />

Figure 73. Measurement Uncertainty Confounds Time-Stamping of<br />

High-Frequency Trades<br />

Time<br />

Source: <strong>OFR</strong> analysis<br />

Conclusion: Data Require Continuing Attention<br />

y +<br />

x – y*<br />

y –<br />

x*<br />

x +<br />

The true trade times, x* and y*,<br />

are unobserved. Time stamps<br />

must either round up or down.<br />

Which trade occurs first?<br />

Risk management and financial stability assessment require data of sufficient<br />

scope, high quality, and proper accessibility. Much progress has been<br />

made to improve data since the crisis. But further improvement requires<br />

attention to the deficiencies that persist. The <strong>OFR</strong> has also seen that even<br />

though industry participants praise standards, they may not adopt them<br />

without mandates from regulators. The recent progress of the LEI provides<br />

an example (see Crowley, <strong>2016</strong>).<br />

Data management is often viewed as a firm-specific risk. However, it y +<br />

also presents possible systemic risks. Increasing complexity and interconnections<br />

present ever-evolving challenges.<br />

x<br />

y*<br />

y – x*<br />

–<br />

Time<br />

x +<br />

The true trade times, x* and y*,<br />

are unobserved. Time stamps<br />

must either round up or down.<br />

Which trade occurs first?<br />

Key Threats to <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Stability</strong> 91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!