11.12.2012 Views

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE SPIRITUAL DIMENSION OF QUALITY:<br />

A BIBLICAL PERSPECTIVE<br />

Maguad, Ben A.<br />

Andrews University<br />

maguad@andrews.edu<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The spiritual dimension <strong>of</strong> quality is probably the most powerful and most pervasive <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

product and service quality dimensions. It forces us to look beyond ourselves and our narrow<br />

self-interests. Powerful though may be, the spiritual dimension is perhaps still the most humane<br />

<strong>of</strong> all the dimensions. It helps us to realize how connected we are to one another and to the<br />

world outside <strong>of</strong> ourselves.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Quality is a complex concept. Its meaning varies with different people and <strong>org</strong>anizations. For<br />

example, a common notio n <strong>of</strong> qualit y is that it is synon ymous with superior ity or excellence<br />

(Evans and Lindsay, 1999). It is something that is intuitively understood but almost impossible to<br />

communicate to others (Foster, 2007). This view is referred to as the transcendent definition <strong>of</strong><br />

quality. You may not be able to define it precisely but “you know it when you see it” (Pirsig,<br />

1974, p. 185). Another definition <strong>of</strong> quality is that it is a function <strong>of</strong> a specific, measurable<br />

variable. Thi s product-bas ed approach views qualit y as the presence or absence <strong>of</strong> a particular<br />

desired attribute. The greater the am ount <strong>of</strong> a desired attribute possessed by a product or service,<br />

the better the quality.<br />

The m anufacturing-based approach defines quality as conformance to a set <strong>of</strong> requirements or<br />

specifications and “making it right the first time” (Crosby, 1979, p. 15). Any deviation from these<br />

requirements or specifications im plies lack <strong>of</strong> quality. According to th e user-based approach,<br />

quality “lies in the eyes <strong>of</strong> the beholder” (Garvin, 1988, p. 43). The quality <strong>of</strong> a product or service<br />

depends on its ability to satisfy the preferen ces <strong>of</strong> individual consum ers. The user-based<br />

definition is one that is highly subjective. The value-based approach, on the other hand, de fines<br />

quality in terms <strong>of</strong> cost and price. A quality product or service is one that “performs or conforms”<br />

at an acceptable cost or price.<br />

Product quality can be described in ter ms <strong>of</strong> eight dimensions or categories (Garvin, 1988). They<br />

are perfor mance, features, reliability , conformance, durability , serviceability, aesthetics, and<br />

perceived quality . Although this list i s the most widely cited and used, i t is by no means<br />

exhaustive. Service quality, on the ot her hand, can be disaggregated into five key dim ensions<br />

(Zeithamel, Parasuraman, and Berry, 1984). They are tangibles, service reliability, responsiveness,<br />

assurance, and em pathy. This list is also by no means exhaustive. A major challenge assoc iated<br />

with m ultiple definitions and dim ensions <strong>of</strong> quality is commu nication (Fos ter, 2007). When<br />

communication is weak, it is difficult to devise a c oherent strategic plan relating to q uality. If<br />

different units in the <strong>org</strong>anization unde rstand quality differently, the strategic p lan will not be in<br />

alignment. Therefore, as a m atter o f necessity , the existence <strong>of</strong> m ultiple definitions and<br />

dimensions should allow f or measures to be ta ken to work towards a common quality definition<br />

and a common quality goal.<br />

ASBBS E-Journal, Volume 4, No.1, 2008 131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!