11.12.2012 Views

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

King and Case<br />

Since soldiers were given nearly a full year’s clothing allowance when they entered military<br />

service, the army carefully reviewed any man who developed a disability shortly after enlistment.<br />

Many unethical men joined the military in order to receive a full year’s clothing allowance and<br />

then faked a major disability. If the disability was determined to be legitimate and the “disability<br />

was the result <strong>of</strong> no indiscretion on his part,” the soldier was allowed to keep the clothing upon<br />

his termination from service with no deduction taken from his final wage statement (Kautz, Clerk,<br />

23). If, however, the soldier was found to have been <strong>of</strong> “unworthy character” and the disability<br />

was fraudulent, a deduction was taken from his final payroll payment. This again shows the need<br />

for internal controls in order to reduce fraudulent behavior. The army promoted an “ethical<br />

climate” similar to the “control environment” component <strong>of</strong> the COSO definition <strong>of</strong> internal<br />

control (Arens, et.al., 2008).<br />

A final control was required to safeguard military clothing involved soldiers who were “careless<br />

and improvident” and resorted to selling their clothing to earn some extra money. This problem<br />

existed in certain areas where retail clothing stores were not common. In these areas, local<br />

residents were anxious to purchase clothing at prices significantly higher than the army’s internal<br />

cost (Kautz, Clerk, 24). This allowed soldiers to pr<strong>of</strong>it on the sale <strong>of</strong> clothing since the internal<br />

cost was substantially less than the <strong>market</strong> price to local residents. An internal control to reduce<br />

this opportunity was the “frequent inspection <strong>of</strong> soldier’s clothing” by the <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company. Soldiers were questioned regularly (clothing audits) if any <strong>of</strong> their clothing was<br />

missing (Ibid). The concept <strong>of</strong> “independent reviews and audits” continues to be a major control<br />

activity in modern business operations.<br />

Penalties were very severe if a soldier was convicted <strong>of</strong> selling clothing. The Act <strong>of</strong> January 11,<br />

1812 prohibited the purchase <strong>of</strong> military clothing by any person not serving in active duty. The<br />

punishment included a penalty <strong>of</strong> three hundred dollars and one year’s imprisonment (Ibid.). This,<br />

however, did not eliminate the black <strong>market</strong> in military clothing. Penalties for the soldier, under<br />

the 38 th Article <strong>of</strong> War, also applied if they were found guilty <strong>of</strong> selling clothing. Section 23 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Act <strong>of</strong> March 3, 1863 authorizes military <strong>of</strong>ficers to seize any “clothes, arms, military outfits<br />

and accoutrements” previously issued to soldiers but now in the hands <strong>of</strong> civilians. A significant<br />

number <strong>of</strong> internal controls were required to safeguard the army’s clothing inventory.<br />

The next book or journal was called the Order Book that contained all <strong>of</strong> the general orders<br />

received from regimental headquarters and also any special company orders or assignments. For<br />

example, any soldier taken from the company for special duty elsewhere would appear in the<br />

Order Book. This document was either <strong>org</strong>anized chronologically based on date <strong>of</strong> the orders or<br />

by type <strong>of</strong> order. Again, internal controls require that “adequate documents and records” be<br />

maintained on a continuous basis.<br />

The Company Fund Account Book was a cash fund utilized by the unit for the purchase <strong>of</strong><br />

necessities that were not furnished by the Army (Kautz, Clerk, 25). It had two sides similar to a<br />

modern general ledger account. On the left or debit side, the sources <strong>of</strong> company funds were<br />

listed. This side began with the fund’s beginning balance and listed the sources <strong>of</strong> cash such as<br />

money transferred from the Regimental Fund and funds withdrawn from the company savings<br />

account. This fund also increased as a result <strong>of</strong> the sale <strong>of</strong> unused company rations and surplus<br />

vegetables raised in a company garden if the company was stationed in a single location for an<br />

extended period. Cash expenditures were recorded on the right or credit side and were typically<br />

for products not normally provided by the army such as fresh vegetables, brooms, carpenter’s<br />

tools, and food condiments. This book was an important record for the company and served as a<br />

control over cash similar to a petty cash fund utilized by businesses today.<br />

ASBBS E-Journal, Volume 4, No.1, 2008 79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!