11.12.2012 Views

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Browning<br />

to fully realize each <strong>of</strong> the following seven principles. Good practice encourages student-faculty<br />

contact; Good practice encourages cooperation among students; Good practice encourages active<br />

learning; Good practice gives prompt feedback; God practice emphasizes time on task; Good<br />

practice communicates high expectations and; Good practice respects diverse talents and ways <strong>of</strong><br />

leaning. These seven principles can serve as guideposts to ensure that undergraduate and<br />

graduate level faculty functioning within a virtual <strong>of</strong>fice environment meet student learning<br />

needs.<br />

Related to the seven principles <strong>of</strong> good practice is Colvin’s work (1998). Colvin recognizes<br />

interaction as an integral part <strong>of</strong> learning and suggests that faculty maximize their interactions<br />

with learners to help facilitate learning. With the virtual <strong>of</strong>fice, faculty no longer have to rely on<br />

face-to-face interaction with students. A cooperative learning environment is one where learners<br />

work together in pairs or groups to achieve a learning outcome or objective. According to<br />

Hatfield and Hatfield (1995), there are benefits to learners engaged in cooperative learning.<br />

Faculty can create cooperative learning communities by promoting virtual student teams which<br />

can be facilitated and monitored by faculty within their virtual <strong>of</strong>fice space.<br />

The Embrace <strong>of</strong> Diversity: Ehrmann (1999) explains that technologies such as e-mail and phone<br />

conferencing make it possible to draw together more diverse students and faculty. Ehrmann<br />

further asserts that many feel protected by the facelessness. For example, faculty and students<br />

who are physically challenged and unable to walk long distances to the on campus <strong>of</strong>fice space<br />

may seek great comfort in the virtual <strong>of</strong>fice space. Also, with the wide range <strong>of</strong> religions and<br />

days <strong>of</strong> worship in today’s society, the virtual <strong>of</strong>fice enables individuals to honor their spiritual<br />

obligations without missing days from the physical workplace. One <strong>of</strong> the keys to respecting<br />

diversity is in understanding. By engaging in dialogue before seeing, individuals are less likely to<br />

make assumptions based on physical appearance. Race, gender, age, and other ways in which we<br />

are physically different should be celebrated but are less likely to create barriers within the virtual<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice setting. In the virtual <strong>of</strong>fice setting, there is an increased opportunity to focus on character<br />

through dialogue. Such a focus paves the way for understanding, thereby making room for the<br />

embrace <strong>of</strong> diversity including diverse beliefs and ways <strong>of</strong> life.<br />

CHALLENGES<br />

Technology: In the virtual <strong>of</strong>fice, the majority <strong>of</strong> faculty members utilize their own equipment.<br />

To meet the rapid growth <strong>of</strong> technology, an increasing number <strong>of</strong> institutions issue lap top<br />

computers, headsets, microphones and web cameras to faculty members as a resource for online<br />

teaching and <strong>of</strong>fsite work. Yet, every faculty member bears some responsibility for set up,<br />

maintenance, and internet connection. Additional challenges arise for faculty members in rural<br />

areas or limited internet connectivity. These inconsistencies diminish predictability and<br />

dependability needed for quality faculty student interactions. The wide range <strong>of</strong> technological<br />

challenges is present for faculty functioning within the traditional on-site <strong>of</strong>fice setting as well as<br />

the home <strong>of</strong>fice setting. As such, the majority <strong>of</strong> institutions allocate substantial resources for<br />

yearly improvements in technology.<br />

Opportunity for abuse: Are faculty really working 100% when distracted by TV, family, perfect<br />

weather and the like? Although abuses can happen in onsite workplaces as well, it may be less<br />

common with management’s close presence. The issue here is trust. Institutions must hire<br />

faculty members they can trust and, as pointed out by Tschannen-Moran (2001), trust is crucial in<br />

facilitating cooperation. A review <strong>of</strong> the literature on trust (Tschannen-Moran & Hoy, 1998) led<br />

to the identification <strong>of</strong> a host <strong>of</strong> different definitions. Most definitions are based on common<br />

beliefs that individuals or groups would act in ways that were in the best interest <strong>of</strong> the concerned<br />

party. In addition to reducing instances <strong>of</strong> abuse, an added benefit <strong>of</strong> trust is employee job<br />

ASBBS E-Journal, Volume 4, No.1, 2008 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!