11.12.2012 Views

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

stock repurchase announcements: a test of market ... - Asbbs.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE OF<br />

ACCOUNTING FOR INCOME TAXES FROM 1920<br />

THROUGH 1984<br />

Myers, Joan K.<br />

Le Moyne College<br />

myersjk@lemoyne.edu<br />

Collins, Mary K.<br />

Le Moyne College<br />

collinsm@lemoyne.edu<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

In this paper, the literature is reviewed to chronicle the development <strong>of</strong> accounting for income<br />

taxes from 1920 through 1984. The reporting <strong>of</strong> income taxes has been a controversial topic<br />

since the advent <strong>of</strong> taxation. This paper follows the evolution <strong>of</strong> reporting from the early taxation<br />

years through APB 11 and the post-APB 11 environment. Specifically, opinions from both<br />

theoreticians and practitioners are cited as the standards are developed.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this paper is to chronicle the regulatory and standard setting environm ent that<br />

influenced accounting for income taxes fro m 1920 through 198 4. A historical review <strong>of</strong> the<br />

literature encompassed not only regulatory and promulgated standards regarding accounting for<br />

income taxes, but also the oretical articl es and the articles by pra ctitioners. Political pressures<br />

voiced by the practitioner co mmunity that im pacted the standard setting environm ent are<br />

highlighted.<br />

THE EARLY YEARS (1920 – 1967)<br />

How should income taxes be reported? That question is almost as old as the first laws instituting<br />

a Federal Income Tax. Ini tially, income taxes were regarded as a distribution <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its. Special<br />

Bulletin No. 1, January 1920, <strong>of</strong> the American Inst itute <strong>of</strong> Acco untants stated, “It is apparently<br />

the theory <strong>of</strong> the governm ent that it is t aking part <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>its, t hat it is asking the taxpa yer to<br />

share his pr<strong>of</strong>its with the governm ent. These taxes, therefore, are not ordinary expenses, such as<br />

would be deducted as a matter <strong>of</strong> course determ ining t he pr<strong>of</strong> its in which the manager <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company would share,” ( Winborne and Kleespie, 1966). In 1936, the American Institu te <strong>of</strong><br />

Accountants, in its publication, “Examination <strong>of</strong> F inancial Statements,” then perm itted income<br />

taxes to be shown as “other charges.” In that same year, the American Ac counting Association<br />

(AAA) cla ssified inco me t axes as an operating e xpense. The AAA subsequently changed thi s<br />

perspective in 1941, statin g that tax was not in the nature <strong>of</strong> an operating expense and should be<br />

shown on the income statement only in the amount currently payable.<br />

ASBBS E-Journal, Volume 4, No.1, 2008 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!