Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
78<br />
JUSTICE AND TOLERANCE IN THE OUR'AN<br />
whereby numerous complex org<strong>an</strong>s of <strong>the</strong>se org<strong>an</strong>isms such<br />
as <strong>the</strong> ears, eyes, lungs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> w<strong>in</strong>gs, underwent "mutations,"<br />
that is, genetic disorders. Yet, <strong>the</strong>re is <strong>an</strong> outright scientific<br />
fact that totally underm<strong>in</strong>es this <strong>the</strong>ory: Mutations do not<br />
cause liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>gs to develop; on <strong>the</strong> contrary, <strong>the</strong>y always<br />
cause harm to <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
The reason for this is very simple: <strong>the</strong> DNA has a very<br />
complex structure <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om effects c<strong>an</strong> only cause harm to<br />
it. Americ<strong>an</strong> geneticist B.G. R<strong>an</strong>g<strong>an</strong>ath<strong>an</strong> expla<strong>in</strong>s this as<br />
follows:<br />
First, genu<strong>in</strong>e mutations are very rare <strong>in</strong> nature. Secondly,<br />
most mutations are harmful s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y are r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om, ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />
th<strong>an</strong> orderly ch<strong>an</strong>ges <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> structure of genes; <strong>an</strong>y r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>in</strong> a highly ordered system will be for <strong>the</strong> worse, not for<br />
<strong>the</strong> better. For example, if <strong>an</strong> earthquake were to shake a highly<br />
ordered structure such as a build<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>re would be a r<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>om<br />
ch<strong>an</strong>ge <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> framework of <strong>the</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g which, <strong>in</strong> all<br />
probability, would not be <strong>an</strong> improvement. 60<br />
Not surpris<strong>in</strong>gly, no mutation example, which is useful,<br />
that is, which is observed to develop <strong>the</strong> genetic code, has<br />
been observed so far. All mutations have proved to be<br />
harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is<br />
presented as <strong>an</strong> "evolutionary mech<strong>an</strong>ism," is actually a<br />
genetic occurrence that harms liv<strong>in</strong>g be<strong>in</strong>gs, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> leaves <strong>the</strong>m<br />
disabled. (The most common effect of mutation on hum<strong>an</strong><br />
be<strong>in</strong>gs is c<strong>an</strong>cer). No doubt, a destructive mech<strong>an</strong>ism c<strong>an</strong>not<br />
be <strong>an</strong> "evolutionary mech<strong>an</strong>ism." Natural selection, on <strong>the</strong><br />
o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong>, "c<strong>an</strong> do noth<strong>in</strong>g by itself" as Darw<strong>in</strong> also<br />
accepted. This fact shows us that <strong>the</strong>re is no "evolutionary<br />
mech<strong>an</strong>ism" <strong>in</strong> nature. S<strong>in</strong>ce no evolutionary mech<strong>an</strong>ism