13.12.2012 Views

XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office

XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office

XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to build “safety” into the design. In the 1960s, the Army and civil rotorcraft<br />

operators were experiencing loss of life and property due to post-crash fires.<br />

Studies that examined the statistics from these crashes showed that injuries<br />

and fatalities were significantly reduced when rupture and tear resistant fuel<br />

cells were installed. The fuel cells, basically flexible rubberized fabric bladders<br />

that held the fuel, were less likely to burst and release fuel upon impact<br />

with the ground than rigid metal tanks or fuel-containing wing structures that<br />

did not include the bladders. By the early 1970s, the use of fuel cells, in particular<br />

in Army helicopters, had dramatically reduced the incidence of postcrash,<br />

fuel-fed fires.<br />

The original Bell Model 300 design (predecessor to the <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong>) incorporated a<br />

“wet wing,” which used the volume within the wing to hold the fuel. While<br />

crashworthy fuel bladders would significantly increase the cost and weight of the<br />

fuel system and would reduce the available fuel volume by about five percent,<br />

the potential safety benefits were believed to be high enough to accept penalties,<br />

and the fuel cells were made part of the <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> design.<br />

Bell then contracted with Uniroyal Inc., of Mishawaka, Indiana, the manufacturers<br />

of fuel cells for Army helicopters and Air Force fixed-wing fighters, to<br />

fabricate the cells for the <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> TRRA. With no background in the design of<br />

fuel cells for a research aircraft, a method for the selection of the thickness of<br />

the rubberized fabric (i.e. the number of the rubberized fabric laminates used<br />

in the bladder material) had to be defined. Thinner fabric would be lighter and<br />

easier to install in the wing (through small openings in the aft wing spar) but<br />

it would be more susceptible to impact damage than the thicker-wall material.<br />

To resolve the issue, a standard test was conducted at the Uniroyal facility on<br />

December 3, 1974. Two test bladders, in the shape of cubes measuring three<br />

feet on each side were fabricated, one with a light gage material and one with<br />

a thick wall material. The bladders were filled with water and dropped from a<br />

height of 65 feet onto a concrete surface. The lighter-gage material bladder<br />

ruptured on impact, while the thicker-walled bladder material did not. This<br />

not-so-scientific method, along with the previously qualified seam and fitting<br />

designs and validation of acceptable tear and puncture material characteristics,<br />

provided the basis for the qualification of the thicker-wall fuel cells for use in<br />

the <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong>.<br />

In addition to the fuel bladders intended to provide fuel containment in the event<br />

of damage to the wing structure, the interconnecting fuel lines between adjoining<br />

cells (there are two cells in each wing) were provided with breakaway fittings<br />

which sealed in fuel when the lines were broken on impact.<br />

The fuel system, like all other critical <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> TRRA systems, was designed with<br />

adequate redundancies (such as dual fuel pumps with the capability to feed both<br />

engines) so that a single failure would not result in the requirement to terminate<br />

the flight.<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!