XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office
XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office
XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Navy Participation<br />
For a period of about eight years, starting in the mid-1970s, the USA experienced<br />
one of the longest sustained periods of high inflation of the century. This<br />
occurred, unfortunately, while the TRRA project was in its most active phase<br />
and required high levels of contractor labor and expenditures of large amounts<br />
of funding for subcontractor work. The completion of the wind tunnel test of aircraft<br />
N702NA, in June 1978, left it in a non-flightworthy configuration and a<br />
considerable effort was required to refurbish it for flight. In addition, resolution<br />
of technical problems in most of the aircraft-development WBSEs was taking a<br />
toll on the project’s financial resources. The “joint” commitment to the TRRA<br />
project by the Army and NASA had, on numerous occasions, served to maintain<br />
the support of each of the parties. Throughout the early years of the project, neither<br />
agency was prepared to be first to walk away from their funding obligation<br />
while the other was seen to be preparing to step up to the challenge. However, by<br />
early 1979 costs had grown to the point where the TRRA Project <strong>Office</strong> was<br />
forced to reevaluate its plans for the completion of the project in light of its<br />
resource limitations. Among the solutions considered was the reduction of the<br />
contractor’s flight program, a reduction of the procurement of needed spare<br />
parts, and the discontinuation of work on aircraft N702NA. Each of these<br />
approaches could have serious adverse effects on the ability of the TRRA project<br />
to complete its technical goals.<br />
Meanwhile, starting in early 1978, the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR)<br />
had been engaged in a congressionally-authorized Sea Based Air-Master Study<br />
(SBA-MS) 33 to assess the Navy’s technology requirements. The report to<br />
Congress was to “evaluate the capabilities and cost effectiveness of current and<br />
future platform, aircraft and weapon system combinations.” The aircraft to be<br />
considered included VTOL and V/STOL types (and, in fact, the original stimulus<br />
for the SBA-MS was the Navy’s need to establish a basis for, or against, a future<br />
commitment to V/STOL aircraft). For the Navy’s V/STOL Type “A” low speed<br />
application, including the ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare), COD (Carrier<br />
Onboard Delivery), tanker, and SAR (Search and Rescue) missions, the tilt rotor<br />
under development in the NASA/Army TRRA project was a candidate aircraft<br />
type that warranted serious consideration. The <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> was seen by some<br />
33 The Navy’s SBA-MS evolved from the Sea Control Ship (SCS) initiative established by<br />
Admiral Elmo Zumwalt after he became Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) in 1970. The SCS<br />
was to employ high performance V/STOL aircraft to perform various elements of the sea control<br />
mission. Subsequent NAVAIR studies indicated that the tilt rotor aircraft had significant<br />
advantages over other V/STOL concepts when applied to several Navy mission scenarios. In<br />
1976, two years after relieving Admiral Zumwalt, CNO Admiral James Holloway initiated a<br />
new V/STOL aircraft study under which the fighter/attack missions were to be performed by the<br />
V/STOL “B” aircraft, and the assault/support (helicopter replacement) vehicles were designated<br />
V/STOL “A.” During this period the Marine Corps was also investigating replacement aircraft<br />
for their aging fleet of CH-46 helicopters under a program called HMX. Lieutenant General<br />
Thomas Miller, USMC Deputy Chief of Staff, and Rear Admiral C. P. Ekas, Naval Materiel<br />
Command (NAVMAT) Chief of Naval Development directed their subordinates to explore and<br />
demonstrate, if feasible, new aircraft technology that could have potential for future Marine<br />
assault transport applications. This provided the impetus for the Navy’s participation in the<br />
<strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> project.<br />
59