13.12.2012 Views

XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office

XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office

XV-15 litho - NASA's History Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Navy Participation<br />

For a period of about eight years, starting in the mid-1970s, the USA experienced<br />

one of the longest sustained periods of high inflation of the century. This<br />

occurred, unfortunately, while the TRRA project was in its most active phase<br />

and required high levels of contractor labor and expenditures of large amounts<br />

of funding for subcontractor work. The completion of the wind tunnel test of aircraft<br />

N702NA, in June 1978, left it in a non-flightworthy configuration and a<br />

considerable effort was required to refurbish it for flight. In addition, resolution<br />

of technical problems in most of the aircraft-development WBSEs was taking a<br />

toll on the project’s financial resources. The “joint” commitment to the TRRA<br />

project by the Army and NASA had, on numerous occasions, served to maintain<br />

the support of each of the parties. Throughout the early years of the project, neither<br />

agency was prepared to be first to walk away from their funding obligation<br />

while the other was seen to be preparing to step up to the challenge. However, by<br />

early 1979 costs had grown to the point where the TRRA Project <strong>Office</strong> was<br />

forced to reevaluate its plans for the completion of the project in light of its<br />

resource limitations. Among the solutions considered was the reduction of the<br />

contractor’s flight program, a reduction of the procurement of needed spare<br />

parts, and the discontinuation of work on aircraft N702NA. Each of these<br />

approaches could have serious adverse effects on the ability of the TRRA project<br />

to complete its technical goals.<br />

Meanwhile, starting in early 1978, the Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR)<br />

had been engaged in a congressionally-authorized Sea Based Air-Master Study<br />

(SBA-MS) 33 to assess the Navy’s technology requirements. The report to<br />

Congress was to “evaluate the capabilities and cost effectiveness of current and<br />

future platform, aircraft and weapon system combinations.” The aircraft to be<br />

considered included VTOL and V/STOL types (and, in fact, the original stimulus<br />

for the SBA-MS was the Navy’s need to establish a basis for, or against, a future<br />

commitment to V/STOL aircraft). For the Navy’s V/STOL Type “A” low speed<br />

application, including the ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare), COD (Carrier<br />

Onboard Delivery), tanker, and SAR (Search and Rescue) missions, the tilt rotor<br />

under development in the NASA/Army TRRA project was a candidate aircraft<br />

type that warranted serious consideration. The <strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> was seen by some<br />

33 The Navy’s SBA-MS evolved from the Sea Control Ship (SCS) initiative established by<br />

Admiral Elmo Zumwalt after he became Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) in 1970. The SCS<br />

was to employ high performance V/STOL aircraft to perform various elements of the sea control<br />

mission. Subsequent NAVAIR studies indicated that the tilt rotor aircraft had significant<br />

advantages over other V/STOL concepts when applied to several Navy mission scenarios. In<br />

1976, two years after relieving Admiral Zumwalt, CNO Admiral James Holloway initiated a<br />

new V/STOL aircraft study under which the fighter/attack missions were to be performed by the<br />

V/STOL “B” aircraft, and the assault/support (helicopter replacement) vehicles were designated<br />

V/STOL “A.” During this period the Marine Corps was also investigating replacement aircraft<br />

for their aging fleet of CH-46 helicopters under a program called HMX. Lieutenant General<br />

Thomas Miller, USMC Deputy Chief of Staff, and Rear Admiral C. P. Ekas, Naval Materiel<br />

Command (NAVMAT) Chief of Naval Development directed their subordinates to explore and<br />

demonstrate, if feasible, new aircraft technology that could have potential for future Marine<br />

assault transport applications. This provided the impetus for the Navy’s participation in the<br />

<strong>XV</strong>-<strong>15</strong> project.<br />

59

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!