08.01.2018 Views

oxford_guide_to_english_grammar

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PAGE 121<br />

96 Probability<br />

NOTE<br />

a In informal English we can sometimes use have (got) <strong>to</strong> for logical necessity.<br />

There has <strong>to</strong>/has got <strong>to</strong> be some mistake.<br />

b We can also use be sure/bound <strong>to</strong>.<br />

Carl is sure <strong>to</strong>/is bound <strong>to</strong> be sitting in a cafe somewhere.<br />

c For can't and mustn't in the USA, • 303(10).<br />

2 In questions we normally use can or will.<br />

Who will/can that be at the door? Can it really be true?<br />

But can for possibility has a limited use in statements. • 97(2e)<br />

3 We can use the continuous or the perfect after will, must and can't.<br />

Where's Carl?~ He'll be sitting in a cafe somewhere, I expect.<br />

The bus is ten minutes late. It must be coming soon.<br />

This glass is cracked. Someone must have dropped it.<br />

I can't have gone <strong>to</strong> the wrong house. I checked the address.<br />

Compare must have done expressing certainty about the past and had <strong>to</strong><br />

expressing a past necessity.<br />

This film seems very familiar. I must have seen it before.<br />

Everyone had been telling me about the film. I had <strong>to</strong> see it.<br />

But for another meaning of had <strong>to</strong>, • (5).<br />

4 Must do is usually a kind of order, a way of telling someone <strong>to</strong> do something. Must<br />

be doing usually means it is logically necessary that something is happening.<br />

You've got exams soon. You must work. (order)<br />

Paul isn't at home. He must be working. (logical necessity)<br />

5 We can use would, had <strong>to</strong> and couldn't when something seemed certain in the past.<br />

There was someone at the door. It would be the milkman.<br />

The fingerprints were the husband's, so he had <strong>to</strong> be the murderer.<br />

Harold stared in amazement. It couldn't be true!<br />

96 Probability: should and ought <strong>to</strong><br />

We use should and ought <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong> say that something is probable, either in the present<br />

or the future.<br />

They should have/ought <strong>to</strong> have our letter by now.<br />

We should know/ought <strong>to</strong> know the result soon.<br />

In the negative the usual form is shouldn't.<br />

We shouldn't have long <strong>to</strong> wait.<br />

Should and ought <strong>to</strong> have the additional meaning 'if all goes well'. We cannot use<br />

these verbs for things going wrong.<br />

The train should be on time. but NOT The train should be late.<br />

NOTE<br />

To express probability we can also use be likely <strong>to</strong> or will probably.<br />

We're likely <strong>to</strong> know the result soon./We'll probably know the result soon.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!