12.02.2018 Views

Holt 7525-9 S15_IT

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In making decisions, humans tend to make comparisons to determine relative values. Let’s say<br />

you are shopping for an inexpensive book (Roget’s Thesaurus) which you have found in your<br />

college bookstore priced at $12. A fellow student informs you that an off-campus bookstore has<br />

the same book priced at $2. Would you make the trip to the off-campus bookstore to save $10?<br />

You probably would, since $10 seems like a huge savings relative to the price of the book. Now<br />

let’s say you are shopping for an expensive textbook (chemistry) which you have found in your<br />

college bookstore priced at $275. A fellow student informs you that an off-campus bookstore has<br />

the same book priced at $265. Would you make the trip to the off-campus bookstore to save $10?<br />

You probably would not, since $10 seems like a trivial savings relative to the price of the book.<br />

In making decisions, humans tend to get “anchored” to the first information that they receive. Let’s<br />

say that 100 college students are shown a new app for their smart phones. They are asked,<br />

“Would you be willing to pay $50 for this new app?” Then they are instructed to “write down the<br />

highest price that you would be willing to pay.” A different group of 100 college students are<br />

shown the same new app. They are asked, “Would you be willing to pay $1 for this new app?”<br />

Then they are instructed to “write down the highest price that you would be willing to pay.” The<br />

first group of students would almost certainly indicate a higher price than the second group of<br />

students. There is no rational reason that a suggested price should influence how highly the<br />

students value the app. But “anchoring” leads to irrational behavior.<br />

In making decisions, humans are influenced by the irrational power of the zero price effect. If you<br />

were offered a choice between buying a $20 iTunes gift card for $12 or buying a $10 iTunes gift<br />

card for $4, you would probably choose the $20 gift card, since the savings is greater, $8 versus<br />

$6. But if you were offered a choice between buying a $20 iTunes gift card for $8 or receiving a<br />

$10 iTunes gift card for free, you would probably choose the $10 gift card.<br />

In making decisions, humans are influenced by social norms versus market norms. Your friend<br />

asks you (as a favor) to help him move to his new apartment. This will take a few hours on<br />

Saturday, and you are happy to do it. Alternatively, your friend offers to pay you $10 to help him<br />

move to his new apartment. The offer of pay moves this from social norm to market norm, and the<br />

pay seems inadequate. You decline.<br />

Other examples of predictably irrational behavior discussed in the book include:<br />

(1) The powerful effect of emotional arousal on decision-making.<br />

(2) The tendency to procrastinate and to fail to exercise self-control.<br />

(3) The “endowment effect”; the tendency to overvalue items that we own.<br />

(4) The difficulty of choosing between similar options.<br />

(5) The effect of expectations, e.g. food served on fancy china will taste better to us than the<br />

same food served on paper plates.<br />

(6) The effect of price on the placebo effect, e.g. an antihistamine that costs you 10 dollars will<br />

relieve your allergies better than an antihistamine that costs you 10 cents, even if the drugs<br />

are chemically identical.<br />

(7) The tendency to consider ourselves as basically honest, while also tending to cheat when the<br />

the opportunity arises.<br />

(8) The tendency to cheat less when money is involved, e.g. we may take a pencil worth 10<br />

cents from work, but we won’t take 10 cents out of the petty cash drawer to buy a pencil.<br />

Appendix: Think Like an Economist – Rational Robbers<br />

If the government responds to an increase in the incidence of liquor store hold-ups by passing a<br />

law that makes the punishment for armed robbery the same as the punishment for murder, there<br />

will be fewer liquor store hold-ups. If you work at a liquor store, will you be happy about this<br />

change in the law? Thinking like an economist (remembering that rational people respond to<br />

incentives), how would you expect the behavior of armed robbers who continue to rob liquor<br />

stores to change in response to the new law?<br />

FOR REVIEW ONLY - NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION<br />

1 - 11 Scarcity and Choices

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!