14.12.2012 Views

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3<br />

3-28<br />

Affected Environment, Environmental<br />

Consequences, and Mitigation<br />

Alternative Impacts<br />

Corridor Mile 32 Alternatives<br />

A. Keep existing and new lines<br />

on tribal land<br />

B. Relocate existing and new<br />

lines away from tribal land<br />

Corridor Mile 35 Alternatives<br />

A. Keep existing and new lines<br />

on tribal land<br />

B. Relocate existing and new<br />

lines away from tribal land<br />

Mitigation<br />

The Columbia River is approximately 3,000 feet to the south, Alder<br />

Creek is approximately 3,000 feet to the west, and a dry wash is<br />

located approximately 1,000 feet to the north of this location.<br />

Therefore, the construction of either of the two Corridor Mile 32<br />

alternatives would not likely affect fish or fish habitat in either the<br />

Columbia River or Alder Creek.<br />

Same as Alternative A.<br />

The Columbia River is located approximately 1,500 feet to the south<br />

of corridor mile 35. One dry wash is located in this area, which<br />

drains to the Columbia River. Potential for delivery of fine sediment<br />

to the Columbia River would be greater with Alternative B<br />

(relocating the line), than with Alternative A due to a greater area of<br />

ground disturbance.<br />

Same as Alternative A.<br />

The following mitigation measures would minimize potential impacts to streams and<br />

fisheries habitat from possible erosion and clearing of vegetation.<br />

� Place towers outside of stream riparian areas and utilize natural landscape features to<br />

span the conductor over existing shrub and tree riparian zones and avoid cutting.<br />

� Place new access roads outside of stream riparian areas, where possible.<br />

� Construct fords instead of culverts at access road crossings of dry washes or seasonal<br />

streams if possible. If culverts are required, design and install to accommodate flows<br />

associated with a 100-year flood event.<br />

� Preserve existing vegetation where practical, especially next to intermittent and<br />

perennial streams.<br />

� Avoid construction within the 200-foot designated stream buffers in Klickitat and<br />

Benton Counties, Washington.<br />

� Maximize the use of existing roads, minimizing the need for new road construction.<br />

� Avoid tower or access road construction on potentially unstable slopes where<br />

feasible.<br />

BPA <strong>McNary</strong>-<strong>John</strong> <strong>Day</strong> <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong><br />

February 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!