14.12.2012 Views

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3<br />

3-94<br />

Affected Environment, Environmental<br />

Consequences, and Mitigation<br />

and Wildlife Viewing Area would have views of the new river crossing near the <strong>John</strong><br />

<strong>Day</strong> Dam looking north across the Columbia River.<br />

Other Viewers<br />

Agricultural workers who would have views of the proposed line would be located<br />

primarily in Benton County, where most of the irrigated cropland along the project<br />

corridor is located. Agricultural workers would be engaged in focused activities, but<br />

their views could be of long duration. The relatively sparse vertical elements in the<br />

viewscape would provide unobstructed views of the proposed line. The agricultural<br />

workers in Sherman County, Oregon, would have partially obstructed views due to their<br />

proximity to the network of transmission lines and towers leading into and out of the<br />

<strong>John</strong> <strong>Day</strong> Substation.<br />

Commercial workers along the corridor would have obstructed and unobstructed views of<br />

the proposed line (depending on their location), and their activities would limit their<br />

duration of views. Workers at Watts Brothers Frozen Foods would have views of the<br />

corridor around corridor mile 13. Views would be most apparent from parking lots or<br />

when the workers are outside of buildings. Humanmade elements in the viewscape<br />

include existing transmission lines on wood poles and steel-lattice towers, buildings, and<br />

fences.<br />

Environmental Consequences—Short-<strong>Line</strong> Routing Alternatives<br />

Table 3-19 summarizes the visual resources impacts associated with the short-line routing<br />

alternatives.<br />

Table 3-19: Impacts of Short-<strong>Line</strong> Routing Alternatives:<br />

Visual Resources<br />

Alternative Impacts<br />

<strong>McNary</strong> Substation Alternatives<br />

A. Relocate administration<br />

building presently located<br />

on north s ide of substation<br />

adjacent to Wildlife Natural<br />

Area<br />

B. Cross Wildlife Natural<br />

Area; circumvent<br />

administration building on<br />

north side<br />

Recreationists at the Corps Wildlife Natural Area and travelers on<br />

I-82 and US 730 would have partially obstructed or unobstructed<br />

views of construction, depending on their location.<br />

Recreationists at the Corps Wildlife Natural Area and travelers on<br />

I-82 would potentially have obstructed views of the proposed line.<br />

BPA <strong>McNary</strong>-<strong>John</strong> <strong>Day</strong> <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

<strong>Draft</strong> <strong>EIS</strong><br />

February 2002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!