DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3 3-96 Affected Environment, Environmental Consequences, and Mitigation � Provide regular maintenance of the access roads and fences within and leading to the corridor. Unavoidable Impacts Remaining after Mitigation The proposed transmission line would be a readily visible part of an existing Bonneville transmission line corridor for residents, travelers on SR 14 and the surrounding county roads and highways, agricultural workers, recreationists, and commercial workers. Depending on the viewer’s location in the viewscape, views of the proposed line and towers would be completely obstructed, partially obstructed, or unobstructed. Environmental Consequences—No Action Alternative Under the No Action Alternative, the visual quality and sensitivity of the viewers along the existing Bonneville corridor would not be influenced by the proposed project. Viewers would continue to see the existing transmission lines and towers in the existing Bonneville transmission line corridor. Socioeconomics, Public Services, and Utilities Affected Environment The study area for this section covers six counties, four of which are where the proposed project would be located. The other two counties, Franklin County in Washington and Wasco County in Oregon, are less likely to be affected, but were also included in the population, employment, and housing analyses because they could potentially provide and house part of the construction workforce. Population Growth In 2000, the six-county study area had a population of 307,256 people. Benton County, Washington, was the most populated with 142,475 people and Sherman County, Oregon, was the least populated with 1,934 people. Overall, the study area experienced a 2.3% average annual increase in population from 1990 to 2000, somewhat greater than the average annual increases for Washington and Oregon (2.1% and 2.0%, respectively). The counties with the greatest increases in average annual growth for that period were Franklin County (3.2%) and Benton County (2.7%) in Washington, and Umatilla County (1.9%) in Oregon. Unlike the rest of the study area, Sherman County experienced virtually no population change (0.08%) from 1990 to 2000. BPA McNary-John Day Transmission Project Draft EIS February 2002
BPA McNary-John Day Transmission Project Draft EIS February 2002 Visual Resources/ Socioeconomics The growth experienced in the 1990s reversed the stagnant annual average population growth in the study area, 0.3%, occurring during the 1980s. Employment In 2000, Oregon’s three-county study area employment was 42,135 people, of that the average annual agricultural employment was 4,350. In 1999, Washington’s three-county study area total employment (including agriculture) was 87,627 and of this total, agriculture, forestry, and fishing accounted for 11,241 people. Oregon The data for agricultural employment in Oregon was based on the Current Population Survey (an annual survey of households in Oregon) and was therefore not combined in a table with the nonagricultural employment, which is based on the 1987 Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) manual. In 2000, the annual average agricultural employment in Sherman County was 250 people, Umatilla County was 2,380 people, and Wasco County was 1,720 people, while it was 52,700 in the state of Oregon. All data was obtained from the Oregon Employment Department. In 2000, employment in the agricultural sector was roughly 10.3% of the combined study area counties (when agriculture and nonagriculture data are combined). Specifically, agricultural employment was roughly 26.7% in Sherman County, 15.6% in Wasco County, and 7.8% in Umatilla County. The remaining approximately 90% was nonagricultural employment in the three-county area in 2000. The primary nonagricultural employment sectors in the combined threecounty area were wholesale and retail trade (25.8%), government (25.6%), services (20.6%), and manufacturing (14.6%). Employment in all other sectors was less than 6% each. Specifically, the primary nonagricultural employment sectors in Sherman County were wholesale and retail trade (45.3%), government (42.3%), and services (5.8%), similar to Umatilla and Wasco Counties. In Umatilla County, government employment was 25.1%, wholesale and retail trade was 24.9%, and services was 19%. Manufacturing in Umatilla County was 15.7%. In Wasco County, the primary sectors were wholesale and retail trade (27.0%), government (26.0%), services (24.5%), and manufacturing (12.6%). All other employment sectors in Wasco County were less than 4% each. The distributions are relatively similar to the state of Oregon (see Table E-1 in Appendix E). The 2000 average annual unemployment levels in Sherman, Umatilla, and Wasco Counties were 5.7%, 6.4%, and 6.5%, respectively, somewhat greater than the state’s 2000 annual average unemployment rate of 4.9%. 3-97
Page 1 and 2:
McNary-John Day Transmission Line P
Page 3 and 4:
ii Maintenance.....................
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures S-1 Vicinity Map ..
Page 7 and 8:
3-17 Sensitive Wildlife Species Pot
Page 9 and 10:
Summary problem of lack of power, p
Page 11 and 12:
BPA McNary-John Day Transmission Pr
Page 13 and 14:
Alternatives BPA McNary-John Day Tr
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Mitigation BPA McNary-John Day Tran
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Environmental Consequences—Propos
Page 25 and 26:
Vegetation Affected Environment BPA
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Operation and Maintenance BPA McNar
Page 31 and 32:
Cultural Resources Affected Environ
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Socioeconomics, Public Services, an
Page 37 and 38:
Transportation Affected Environment
Page 39 and 40:
Environmental Consequences—Propos
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Table S-2: Summary of Impacts of Sh
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Transmission Infrastructure BPA McN
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Plymouth Generating Facility BPA Mc
Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 2 Proposed Action and Alter
Page 57 and 58:
2 2-2 Proposed Action and Alternati
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
2 2-10 Proposed Action and Alternat
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 76 and 77:
Table 2-3: Summary of Impacts and M
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Chapter 3 Affected Environment, Env
Page 86 and 87:
3 3-2 Affected Environment, Environ
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
3 3-10 Affected Environment, Enviro
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131: 3 3-46 Affected Environment, Enviro
Page 184 and 185: 3 3-100 Affected Environment, Envir
Page 218 and 219: BPA McNary-John Day Transmission Pr
Page 228 and 229: Noise BPA McNary-John Day Transmiss
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Chapter 5 References Printed Refere
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
StreamNet. 2001. StreamNet: Fish Da
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
State Senator and Representatives J
Page 250 and 251:
Media East Oregonian (Pendleton) Go
Page 252 and 253:
Chapter 7 List of Preparers The McN
Page 254 and 255:
Galan McInelly—Geologist. Respons
Page 256 and 257:
Chapter 8 Glossary and Acronyms Glo
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Pithouse: a semi-subterranean “ea
Page 262 and 263:
Ecology Washington State Department
Page 264 and 265:
Appendix A Agency Correspondence an
Page 266 and 267:
BPA Tribal Policy April 1996 It is
Page 268 and 269:
8. Strive to develop and achieve mu
Page 270:
• Provide assistance in establish
Page 274 and 275:
> > > Chris Soncarty > Fisheries Bi
Page 276 and 277:
Appendix B Public Involvement � L
Page 278 and 279:
Most of the comments (45%) focused
Page 280 and 281:
We do not plan to give a formal pre
Page 282 and 283:
Mtg1 1 Need What is driving the nee
Page 284 and 285:
Letter 1 Need The Pacific Northwest
Page 286 and 287:
Mtg1 1 Need Nuclear is safe. Mtg1 1
Page 288 and 289:
Mtg1 1 Process What happens if I do
Page 290 and 291:
Mtg2 2 Alternatives What about goin
Page 292 and 293:
Mtg1 2 Construction We have telepho
Page 294 and 295:
Mtg2 2 Description Will this line b
Page 296 and 297:
Letter 3 Cultural Resources Mtg1 3
Page 298 and 299:
Mtg1 3 E-social Feel sorry for folk
Page 300 and 301:
Mtg2 3 Landuse I'll need to remove
Page 302 and 303:
Mtg1 3 Public Health We get shocked
Page 304 and 305:
Form 3 Vegetation I am distressed t
Page 306 and 307:
Mtg1 3 Wildlife Needs mitigation fo
Page 308 and 309:
Appendix C Common and Scientific Na
Page 310 and 311:
Appendix D Common and Scientific Na
Page 312:
D D-2 Common and Scientific Names o
Page 325 and 326:
Appendix G Electric and Magnetic Fi
Page 328:
Bonneville Power Administration/ Mc
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 352 and 353:
Table of Contents Bonneville Power
Page 354 and 355:
1.0 Introduction Bonneville Power A
Page 356 and 357:
Bonneville Power Administration/McN
Page 358 and 359:
Page 360 and 361:
Page 362 and 363:
Page 364 and 365:
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Page 374 and 375:
Page 376 and 377:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
List of References Cited Bonneville
Page 382 and 383:
Page 384 and 385:
List of Preparers Bonneville Power
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Table 2, continued Bonneville Power
Page 390 and 391:
Table 2, continued Bonneville Power
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 396 and 397:
Page 398 and 399:
Page 400 and 401:
Figure 1, continued c) Proposed lin
Page 402 and 403:
Figure 1, continued Bonneville Powe
Page 404 and 405:
Page 406 and 407:
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
Page 414 and 415:
Page 416 and 417:
Index 1 100-year floodplain .......
Page 418 and 419:
Glade Creek.......S-9, S-12, 3-8, 3
Page 420 and 421:
scoping .................S-7, 1-4,
show all

DOE/EIS-0332; McNary-John Day Transmission Line Project Draft ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?