03.07.2018 Views

atw 2018-07

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue 6/7 ı June/July<br />

TCEP provides a comprehensive,<br />

rigorous and up-to-date analysis of<br />

the status of the clean-energy transition<br />

across a full range of technologies<br />

and sectors, their recent progress, deployment<br />

rates, investment levels, and<br />

innovation needs. It is the result of<br />

a bottom-up approach backed by<br />

the IEA’s unique understanding of<br />

markets, modeling and energy statistics<br />

across all fuels and technologies,<br />

and its extensive global technology<br />

network, totaling 6,000 researchers<br />

across nearly 40 technology collaboration<br />

programmes.<br />

The analysis includes a series of<br />

high-level indicators that provide an<br />

overall assessment of clean energy<br />

trends and highlight the most important<br />

actions needed for the complex<br />

energy sector transformation.<br />

For the first time, the analysis also<br />

highlights more than 100 key innovation<br />

gaps that need to be addressed<br />

to speed up the development and<br />

deployment of these clean energy<br />

technologies. It provides an extensive<br />

analysis of public and private clean<br />

energy research and development<br />

investment. It found that total public<br />

spending on low-carbon energy technology<br />

innovation rose 13% in 2017,<br />

to more than USD 20 billion.<br />

“There is a critical need for more<br />

vigorous action by governments,<br />

industry, and other stakeholders to<br />

| | IEA: Only 4 out of 38 clean-energy technologies are on track to meet long-term climate goals. IEA's website.<br />

drive advances in energy technologies<br />

that reduce greenhouse gas emissions,”<br />

said Dr Fatih Birol, the IEA’s<br />

Executive Director. “The world doesn’t<br />

have an energy problem but an<br />

emissions problem, and this is where<br />

we should focus our efforts.”<br />

A total of 11 of 38 technologies<br />

surveyed by the IEA were significantly<br />

not on track. In particular, unabated<br />

coal electricity generation (meaning<br />

generation without Carbon Capture,<br />

Utilisation and Storage, or CCUS),<br />

which is responsible for 72% of power<br />

sector emissions, rebounded in 2017<br />

after falling over the last three years.<br />

Meanwhile, two technologies,<br />

onshore wind and energy storage,<br />

were downgraded this year, as their<br />

progress slowed. This brought the<br />

number of technologies “in need of<br />

improvement” to a total of 23.<br />

413<br />

NEWS<br />

Operating Results February <strong>2018</strong><br />

Plant name Country Nominal<br />

capacity<br />

Type<br />

gross<br />

[MW]<br />

net<br />

[MW]<br />

Operating<br />

time<br />

generator<br />

[h]<br />

Energy generated. gross<br />

[MWh]<br />

Month Year Since<br />

commissioning<br />

Time availability<br />

[%]<br />

Energy availability<br />

[%] *) Energy utilisation<br />

[%] *)<br />

Month Year Month Year Month Year<br />

OL1 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 672 618 566 1 301 132 255 955 319 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.88 101.15 100.98<br />

OL2 Olkiluoto BWR FI 910 880 672 620 840 1 309 258 245 608 439 100.00 100.00 99.85 99.89 100.42 100.50<br />

KCB Borssele PWR NL 512 484 672 344 895 726 377 158 933 296 99.87 99.84 99.87 99.84 100.56 100.51<br />

KKB 1 Beznau 1,2,7) PWR CH 380 365 0 0 0 124 746 087 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

KKB 2 Beznau 7) PWR CH 380 365 672 258 171 543 786 131 708 659 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 101.09 101.<strong>07</strong><br />

KKG Gösgen 7) PWR CH 1060 1010 672 720 590 1 515 109 306 709 696 100.00 100.00 99.98 99.98 101.16 100.94<br />

KKM Mühleberg BWR CH 390 373 672 259 910 547 440 124 885 585 100.00 100.00 99.95 99.92 99.17 99.13<br />

CNT-I Trillo PWR ES 1066 1003 672 713 087 1 502 773 240 527 197 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.11 99.15<br />

Dukovany B1 PWR CZ 500 473 672 338 390 711 893 109 342 375 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.93 100.71 100.55<br />

Dukovany B2 PWR CZ 500 473 672 338 186 645 713 105 268 250 100.00 91.03 100.00 90.61 100.65 91.20<br />

Dukovany B3 PWR CZ 500 473 672 335 837 706 003 103 328 430 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.95 99.72<br />

Dukovany B4 PWR CZ 500 473 672 336 572 708 174 103 979 916 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.17 100.02<br />

Temelin B1 1,2) PWR CZ 1080 1030 0 0 0 106 481 294 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Temelin B2 PWR CZ 1080 1030 672 733 731 1 543 400 103 033 346 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 101.10 100.92<br />

Doel 1 PWR BE 454 433 672 306 486 645 085 134 859 832 100.00 100.00 99.99 99.99 100.36 100.28<br />

Doel 2 PWR BE 454 433 672 3<strong>07</strong> 293 647 580 132 899 847 100.00 100.00 99.99 99.85 100.58 100.54<br />

Doel 3 3) PWR BE 1056 1006 0 0 0 251 169 221 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Doel 4 PWR BE 1084 1033 672 740 003 1 554 538 256 100 379 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.59 100.25<br />

Tihange 1 PWR BE 1009 962 672 690 038 1 451 775 292 290 651 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 102.21 102.01<br />

Tihange 2 PWR BE 1055 1008 672 719 012 1 502 554 250 452 091 100.00 100.00 100.00 99.51 102.06 101.17<br />

Tihange 3 PWR BE 1089 1038 672 734 674 1 548 130 270 442 960 100.00 100.00 99.99 100.00 100.30 100.33<br />

News

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!