03.07.2018 Views

atw 2018-07

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>atw</strong> Vol. 63 (<strong>2018</strong>) | Issue 6/7 ı June/July<br />

364<br />

ABSTRACTS | ENGLISH<br />

Poland Faces Delays and Decisions as It<br />

Makes Ambitious Plans to Go Nuclear<br />

NucNet | Page 366<br />

Poland has drawn up ambitious plans to build up to<br />

6,000 MW of nuclear generating capacity, potentially<br />

at two sites, by the late 2030s or early 2040s.<br />

But the government is yet to take a final decision<br />

and the deadline has pushed back several times,<br />

with plans hampered by changes in government,<br />

problems putting in place the right domestic legislation<br />

and the need to find the right financing model.<br />

Poland needs nuclear because of its low carbon<br />

footprint and as a way to decrease the country’s<br />

carbon emissions. Poland is no newcomer to nuclear<br />

technology. The Polish National Centre for Nuclear<br />

Research (NCBJ) has operated a research reactor at<br />

Swierk. In 1971 the government made its first<br />

binding decision to build a nuclear plant. The<br />

project was formally scrapped in 1990.<br />

49 th Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology<br />

(AMNT <strong>2018</strong>): Opening Address<br />

Ralf Güldner | Page 369<br />

As in other years, DAtF and the German Nuclear<br />

Society (KTG), offer a comprehensive program<br />

with their 49 th Annual Meeting on Nuclear Technology,<br />

giving insights into many aspects of nuclear<br />

technology and contributing to the international<br />

exchange of knowledge and experience in industry,<br />

research, politics and administration. In keeping<br />

with long-standing tradition, even in the year<br />

preceding its 50th anniversary, on 7 and 8 May 2019<br />

in Berlin, the AMNT remains the only conference<br />

in Germany, and one of the few in Europe, that<br />

combines all the issues surrounding nuclear<br />

technology under one roof and is dedicated to every<br />

sector of the industry.<br />

TESPA-ROD Code Prediction of the Fuel Rod<br />

Behaviour During Long-term Storage<br />

Heinz G. Sonnenburg | Page 374<br />

The fuel rod code TESPA-ROD is applicable to LOCA<br />

transients and RIA transients. Recently, code<br />

models have been implemented in order to predict<br />

the transitional fuel rod behaviour during longterm<br />

storage. In particular modelling for both<br />

long-term fuel swelling and associated helium gas<br />

release have been implemented. First TESPA-ROD<br />

code predictions for the long-term transient,<br />

including wet storage, drying procedure and dry<br />

storage indicate gap closure between fuel and<br />

cladding. Thus, stress level in the cladding may<br />

depend on both the internal fission gas pressure and<br />

the fuel/cladding mechanical interaction.<br />

New Build Projects Abroad – A Challenge<br />

for Regulation<br />

Christian Raetzke | Page 378<br />

Numerous reactors are under construction or in the<br />

planning stage worldwide. However, compared to<br />

the situation a few decades ago, when the majority<br />

of the plants in operation today were built,<br />

the project models and boundary conditions are<br />

much more diverse, so that traditional models of<br />

regulation, approval and supervision (regulation)<br />

sometimes reach their limits. The article provides<br />

examples of new challenges. Regulation must find<br />

new answers to the challenges. However, it must<br />

not ignore the proven principles and instruments in<br />

order to ensure nuclear safety.<br />

Safety Assessment of the Research Reactors<br />

FRM II And FR MZ After the Fukushima<br />

Event<br />

Axel Pichlmaier, Heiko Gerstenberg, Anton<br />

Kastenmüller, Christian Krokowski, Ulrich Lichnovsky,<br />

Roland Schätzlein, Michael Schmidt,<br />

Christopher Geppert, Klaus Eberhardt<br />

and Sergei Karpuk | Page 379<br />

After the events at the Fukushima-I nuclear power<br />

plant (NPP) in 2011 the Reaktorsicherheitskommission<br />

(RSK) has carried out an overall assessment<br />

of the German nuclear fleet with respect to extreme<br />

(beyond design base) events. This paper deals only<br />

with the research reactors (RR) FRM II (Garching)<br />

and FR MZ (Mainz). The findings of the RSK, its<br />

recommendations and their status of implementation<br />

will be presented.<br />

Decommissioning of Germany’s First<br />

Nuclear Reactor<br />

Ulrich Lichnovsky, Julia Rehberger,<br />

Axel Pichlmaier and Anton Kastenmüller | Page 383<br />

FRM started operating in 1957 as the first nuclear<br />

reactor in Germany. Reactor operation ended in<br />

2000. Licensing procedures for the deconstruction<br />

and dismantling of the reactor started in 1998. In<br />

2014 the Technical University of Munich (TUM) was<br />

granted the license to decommission the reactor.<br />

The article describes the (long) way to the license<br />

for dismantling of the reactor and gives a short overview<br />

of the current state of the decommissioning<br />

project. Results of the (pre-)licensing stage are<br />

presented: disposal of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and<br />

preparation of the safety report containing details<br />

on fire protection, radiological characterization<br />

(neutron activation and contamination), waste<br />

management and safety analysis. With regard to<br />

the current state of the project we will discuss:<br />

clearance of material and current obstacles.<br />

While You were Sleeping:<br />

The Unnoticed Loss of Carbon-free<br />

Generation in the United States<br />

Chris Vlahoplus, Ed Baker, Sean Lawrie,<br />

Paul Quinlan and Benjamin Lozier | Page 389<br />

The United States has embarked on actions to<br />

combat climate change by putting a focus on<br />

lowering the carbon emissions from the electric<br />

generation sector. A pillar of this approach is to<br />

promote the greater use of renewable resources,<br />

such as wind and solar. The past decade has seen<br />

significant growth in carbon-free energy from wind<br />

and solar. Generation from these resources reached<br />

333,000 GWh in 2017. However, unbeknownst to<br />

many who care about climate change, most of the<br />

progress made to date through renewables is at<br />

significant risk due to the loss or potential loss of<br />

more than 228,000 GWh of nuclear carbon-free<br />

generation.<br />

German Secretarial Management ISO/TC<br />

85/SC 6 Reactor Technology<br />

Janine Winkler and Michael Petri | Page 392<br />

On behalf of the Federal Ministry for the Environment,<br />

Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety<br />

(BMU) and represented by the Office of the Nuclear<br />

Safety Standards Commission (KTA), DIN has taken<br />

over the Secretariat of ISO/TC 85/SC 6 Reactor<br />

technology in conjunction with China in <strong>2018</strong>. The<br />

new role provides an opportunity to increase<br />

German participation and influence in the field<br />

of International Standardization, for instance<br />

via conversion of German Industrial and KTA<br />

Standards into International Standards. This<br />

demonstrates that Germany is willing to actively<br />

participate in the ongoing efforts to increase<br />

Nuclear Safety in the peaceful use of Nuclear<br />

Energy.<br />

Thermal Hydraulic Analysis<br />

of the Convective Heat Transfer of an<br />

Air-cooled BWR Spent Fuel Assembly<br />

Christine Partmann, Christoph Schuster<br />

and Antonio Hurtado | Page 397<br />

Since the reactor accident in Fukushima Daiichi,<br />

the vulnerability of spent fuel pools (SFP) is more<br />

focused in nuclear safety research. This paper<br />

presents the experimental findings about the<br />

convective heat transfer of a boiling water reactor<br />

(BWR) spent FA under the absence of water. These<br />

studies are performed within the joint project<br />

SINABEL that is funded by the German Federal<br />

Ministry of Education and Research to investigate<br />

the thermal hydraulics of selected accident<br />

scenarios in SFP experimentally and numerically.<br />

Further Development of a Thermal-<br />

Hydraulics Two-Phase Flow Tool<br />

Verónica Jáuregui Chávez, Uwe Imke,<br />

Javier Jiménez and V.H. Sánchez-Espinoza | Page 401<br />

The numerical simulation tool TWOPORFLOW is<br />

under development at the Institute for Neutron<br />

Physics and Reactor Technology (INR) of the<br />

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). TWOPOR-<br />

FLOW is a thermal-hydraulics code that is able to<br />

simulate single- and two-phase flow in a structured<br />

or unstructured porous medium using a flexible 3-D<br />

Cartesian geometry. The main purpose of this work<br />

is the extension, improvement and validation of<br />

TWOPORFLOW in order to simulate the thermalhydraulic<br />

behavior of Boiling Water Reactor (BWR)<br />

cores.<br />

Special Features of Measurement<br />

for the Radiological Characterization<br />

of High-level Radioactive Waste<br />

Marina Sokcic-Kostic and<br />

Roland Schultheis | Page 404<br />

In nuclear power plants occasionally highly radioactive<br />

waste is produced, such as fragments of<br />

defective fuel elements or filters from hot cells.<br />

NUKEM Technologies Engineering Services has<br />

designed and implemented waste treatment options<br />

for such waste in projects that characterise highlevel<br />

radioactive waste and condition it in accordance<br />

with the requirements for long-term storage.<br />

This also includes a volume reduction to minimize<br />

future storage costs. The focus of this article is on<br />

the measurement of highly active waste and its<br />

implications.<br />

Confidence in Nuclear Safeguards at Risk as<br />

Trump Quits One Deal to Pursue Another<br />

John Shepherd | Page 422<br />

Confidence in nuclear safeguards at risk as Trump<br />

quits one deal to pursue another. By the time you sit<br />

down to read this article, Donald Trump and Kim<br />

Jong Un may have had an historic sit-down of their<br />

own – in fact the first meeting between a sitting US<br />

president and a leader of North Korea.<br />

Abstracts | English

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!