Securities Activities of Banks in the GLB Era - Cleary Gottlieb Steen ...
Securities Activities of Banks in the GLB Era - Cleary Gottlieb Steen ...
Securities Activities of Banks in the GLB Era - Cleary Gottlieb Steen ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>in</strong>traday extension <strong>of</strong> credit at <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bank’s<br />
U.S. bus<strong>in</strong>ess day.<br />
(iii) Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> requirements for exemption from<br />
Section 23A <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> derivative transactions -- o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
than derivative transactions which are essentially<br />
equivalent to a loan -- by a bank with its affiliate (12<br />
C.F.R. § 223.33) that <strong>the</strong> bank establish and ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />
policies and procedures reasonably designed to<br />
manage <strong>the</strong> credit exposure ris<strong>in</strong>g from its derivative<br />
transactions with affiliates <strong>in</strong> a safe and sound manner,<br />
which, at a m<strong>in</strong>imum, provide for (A) monitor<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
controll<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> credit exposure aris<strong>in</strong>g from such<br />
transactions with each affiliate and with all affiliates <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> aggregate (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g impos<strong>in</strong>g appropriate credit<br />
limits, mark-to-mark requirements and collateral<br />
requirements), and (B) ensur<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> bank’s<br />
derivative transactions with affiliates comply with <strong>the</strong><br />
Market Terms Requirement.<br />
(iv) The application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> “attribution rule” (i.e., a<br />
transaction by a bank with any person is deemed to be<br />
a transaction with an affiliate “to <strong>the</strong> extent that <strong>the</strong><br />
proceeds <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> transaction are used for <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong>,<br />
or transferred to, that affiliate”).<br />
(v) Expansive read<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> “covered<br />
transactions” to <strong>in</strong>clude bank securities borrow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
transactions from affiliates. 32<br />
(vi) Application <strong>of</strong> Sections 23A/23B <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
“rebuttable presumption” (12 C.F.R. § 223.2(a)(9)) <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> merchant bank<strong>in</strong>g context that a portfolio company<br />
is an “affiliate” <strong>of</strong> a bank if an FHC that controls <strong>the</strong><br />
bank owns or controls 15% or more <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> equity<br />
capital <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> portfolio company.<br />
32 See Board Letter to Bank <strong>of</strong> America, dated June 7, 2005.<br />
57