Zero to One_ Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future ( PDFDrive )
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
CASH IS NOT KING
For people to be fully committed, they should be properly compensated.
Whenever an entrepreneur asks me to invest in his company, I ask him how
much he intends to pay himself. A company does better the less it pays the CEO
—that’s one of the single clearest patterns I’ve noticed from investing in
hundreds of startups. In no case should a CEO of an early-stage, venture-backed
startup receive more than $150,000 per year in salary. It doesn’t matter if he got
used to making much more than that at Google or if he has a large mortgage and
hefty private school tuition bills. If a CEO collects $300,000 per year, he risks
becoming more like a politician than a founder. High pay incentivizes him to
defend the status quo along with his salary, not to work with everyone else to
surface problems and fix them aggressively. A cash-poor executive, by contrast,
will focus on increasing the value of the company as a whole.
Low CEO pay also sets the standard for everyone else. Aaron Levie, the CEO
of Box, was always careful to pay himself less than everyone else in the
company—four years after he started Box, he was still living two blocks away
from HQ in a one-bedroom apartment with no furniture except a mattress. Every
employee noticed his obvious commitment to the company’s mission and
emulated it. If a CEO doesn’t set an example by taking the lowest salary in the
company, he can do the same thing by drawing the highest salary. So long as that
figure is still modest, it sets an effective ceiling on cash compensation.
Cash is attractive. It offers pure optionality: once you get your paycheck, you
can do anything you want with it. However, high cash compensation teaches
workers to claim value from the company as it already exists instead of investing
their time to create new value in the future. A cash bonus is slightly better than a
cash salary—at least it’s contingent on a job well done. But even so-called
incentive pay encourages short-term thinking and value grabbing. Any kind of
cash is more about the present than the future.