27.12.2012 Views

BoundedRationality_TheAdaptiveToolbox.pdf

BoundedRationality_TheAdaptiveToolbox.pdf

BoundedRationality_TheAdaptiveToolbox.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fast andFrugalHeuristics forEnvironmentally BoundedMinds 65<br />

visual processing. By only being able to focus on very close objects for their first<br />

few months of life, infants can learn about relative object size without the added<br />

complication of size constancy. Once this environmental knowledge has been<br />

acquired, the gradually increasing depth of visual field allows the problem of<br />

size constancy to be learned in an independent, and therefore easier, manner.<br />

Stronger arguments have been made for language learning. It has been put<br />

forth that the cognitive limitations of the developing brain are a necessary hindrance<br />

for a first language to be learned fluently. Newport (1990) has proposed<br />

another type of "less is more" phenomenon in this domain: Lesser ability to remember<br />

and process morphological and semantic components into form—meaning<br />

mappings in young children allows them to learn more rapidly and<br />

accurately those mappings that they do acquire, and then to build further upon<br />

these as language learning proceeds. Late language learners, in contrast, may<br />

falter when attempting to learn the full range of semantic mappings with their<br />

mature mental capacities all at once.<br />

This situation has been studied concretely by Elman (1993) in a neural network<br />

model of language acquisition. When he tried to get a large, recurrent neural<br />

network with an extensive memory to learn the grammatical relationships in<br />

a set of several thousand sentences of varying length and complexity, the network<br />

faltered. It was unable to pick up such concepts as noun-verb agreement in<br />

embedded clauses, something that requires sufficient memory to keep embed<br />

ded and nonembedded clauses disentangled. Instead of taking the obvious step<br />

of adding more memory to the model to attempt to solve this problem, though,<br />

Elman counterintuitively restricted its memory, making the network forget everything<br />

after every three or four words. He hoped in this way to mimic the<br />

memory restrictions of young children first learning language. This restricted-memory<br />

network could not possibly make sense of the long<br />

clause-filled sentences it encountered. Its limitations forced it to focus on the<br />

short, simple sentences in its environment, which it did learn correctly, mastering<br />

the small set of grammatical relationships inherent in this subset of its input.<br />

Elman then increased the network's effective memory by forcing it to forget everything<br />

after five or six words. It was now able to learn a greater proportion of<br />

the sentences to which it was exposed, building on the grammatical relationships<br />

it had already acquired. Further gradual enhancements of the network's<br />

memory allowed it ultimately to learn the entire corpus of sentences that the full<br />

network alone — without the benefit of starting small — had been unable to<br />

fathom.<br />

Elman sees the restrictions of the developing mind as enabling accurate early<br />

learning about a small portion of the environment, which then provides a scaffold<br />

to guide learning and hypothesizing about the rest of the environment in<br />

fruitful, adaptive directions. Cognitive "constraints" are no longer a negative<br />

limitation of our (or our children's) ability to behave adaptively in our environment.<br />

Rather,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!