04.07.2023 Views

Modernist-Cuisine-Vol.-1-Small

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3

FDA-Specified Cooking Times and Temperatures

Food

fish

farmed meat, including that from commercially

raised game animals

eggs broken and cooked to order

ratites (e.g., ostriches, emus, kiwis)

injected or marinated meats

eggs other than those cooked to order

ground or minced fish or meats, including

commercially raised game animals

poultry

baluts

wild game animals

stuffed meat, fish, poultry, pasta

stuffing containing meat, fish, poultry, or ratites

whole-meat roasts from:

pork

beef

corned beef

lamb

cured pork roasts such as ham

Temperature

(°C)

(°F)

Time

Note

63 145 15 s for raw eggs, see below

63 145 3 min for more complete cooking standards, see red

66 150 1 min

line on FDA Time-and- Temperature Curves,

page 187

68 155 15 s

70 158 <1 s

74 165 15 s

54.4 130 112 min for more complete cooking standards, see

55.0 131 89 min

blue line on FDA Time-and-Temperature

Curves, page 187. Time-and- temperature

56.1 133 56 min

combinations yield an approximate 6.5D

57.2 135 36 min

reduction for Salmonella. If meat is cooked in

an oven, that oven must meet certain

57.8 136 28 min

temperature standards (see FDA-Specified

58.9 138 18 min

Oven Temperatures for Roasting Whole-Meat

Roasts, page 186)

60.0 140 12 min

61.1 142 8 min

62.2 144 5 min

62.8 145 4 min

63.9 147 134 s

65.0 149 85 s

66.1 151 54 s

67.2 153 34 s

68.3 155 22 s

69.4 157 14 s

70.0 158 0 s

whole-muscle, intact beef steak 63 145 no time given surface brought to this temperature to achieve

“cooked color change”; no core temperature

required

any raw food of animal origin cooked or

reheated in a microwave oven

74 165 no time given

food reheated in other oven for hot holding 74 165 15 s

reheated ready-to-eat food taken from

hermetically sealed commercial container

57 135 no time given

plant foods (fruits and vegetables) for hot holding 57 135 no time given

fruit or vegetable juice packaged on-site

5D reduction of “most resistant microorganisms of public health significance”

FDA-Specified Cooking Times and Temperatures

milk pasteurization for making cheese 63 145 30 min or any point in the FDA dairy table (see FDA

72 162.1 15 s

Time-and- temperature Curves, pink line)

pasteurization of high-fat or sweet dairy foods

such as ice cream

the FDA version begins at 63 °C / 145 °F instead

of at 54.4 °C / 130 °F. The seemingly arbitrary

decision to start at a higher temperature is puzzling

because all points along the curve yield the

same 6.5D reduction and thus all provide the same

level of safety.

To make matters worse, this curve contains the

same apparent timing error at 70 °C / 158 °F that

bedevils the curve for whole-meat roasts, compounded

by an absence of intermediate data

points between 65 °C / 150 °F and 70 °C / 158 °F.

As we noted before, the final time point of less

than one second cannot be scientifically correct

for whole-meat roastsor for any other food.

Similarly puzzling is the single data point for

fish and for eggs cooked to order (green dot in

graph on page 187). At the specified cooking

temperature of 63 °C / 145 °F, the time requirement

of 15 seconds is dramatically less than the

240 seconds required for the same temperature

point in the FDA’s time-and- temperature table for

cooking meat. Instead of a 6.5D reduction in

Salmonella, 15 seconds of cooking time would

yield only a 0.41D reduction.

As discussed previously, many food safety

experts think that the 6.5D standard is excessive

and that 4.5D would be more reasonable, but

nobody is in favor of 0.41Dthat is simply

ineffective and useless. Even if it did accomplish

something, another question remains: why should

eggs cooked to order require such a slight D-value

reduction when the same eggs, if not cooked to

order, require a 6.5D pathogen reduction?

We asked the FDA, and they could not give us

an answer. Their rationale appears to be simple

pandering to common practices. If you order eggs

“sunny side up” with runny yolks, the typical

cooking temperature will be about 63 °C / 145 °F.

The FDA appears to have observed common

(continued)

89 191.2 1 s

96 204.5 0.05 s

100 212 0.01 s

69 155.6 30 min or any point in the FDA ice cream table (see

80 175.6 25 s

FDA Time-and- temperature Curves, orange

line)

practice then codified it, even though the practice

carries essentially no food safety benefit.

Recall that the FDA does allow you to serve raw

or lightly cooked eggsyou just need to warn

your customers in writing on the menu or elsewhere.

But the warning is not required if you

follow the 63 °C / 145 °F for 15 seconds rule. Why

make such an exception? We don’t know, but it

seems to make no scientific sense.

Of course if you are serious about the safety of

lightly cooked eggs, the right thing to do is use

pasteurized eggswhich can be bought commercially

or easily prepared.

For fish, one could argue that a pathogen other

than Salmonella is the primary target of the

time-and- temperature requirement. But the FDA

does not specify the hazard, and there are no

obvious candidates for a fish-specific pathogen that

would be adequately reduced by 15 seconds of

cooking. Many people, the authors included,

consider fish overcooked at 63 °C / 145 °F. So the

rule ensures that fish will be overcooked but not

necessarily safe.

In many ways, the fish requirement is and

example of food safety rules at their absolute

worst. The regulation accomplishes little to

nothing in terms of real food safety while grossly

harming quality. Because fish is cooked optimally

at very low temperatures (at least in our opinion),

you can’t pasteurize fish without overcooking it.

So when you serve fish, you must accept that it

isn’t pasteurized. This is a small risk that most

people consider acceptable. Following the FDA

regulations will overcook the fish but won’t make it

appreciably safer.

The fundamental conclusion to draw here is

that the time specified for fish and eggs cooked to

order is likely more of a symbolic requirement

than one driven by scientific verities. If the fish or

The fish and egg rule is meaningless

“make-work” regulation—it

achieves little but lets inspectors

and cooks feel as if something has

been done.

For more on pasteurizing eggs, see page 4·78.

Egg pasteurization is not covered

in the FDA Food Code, in part

because of a bureaucratic issue that

a raw pasteurized egg might be

considered a “food ready-to-eat”

and thus be within the purview of

the USDA rather than the FDA.

184 VOLUME 1 · HISTORY AND FUNDAMENTALS

FOOD SAFETY 185

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!