04.07.2023 Views

Modernist-Cuisine-Vol.-1-Small

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5

For more on units of energy and power, see

Converting Among Units of Power, page 273.

Point of No Return

During cooking, subtle irreversible changes, both

physical and chemical, occur in foods. These

changes can alter the specific heat capacity of the

food. As the name suggests, irreversible changes

are the sort that cannot be undone.

Freeze some warm water, melt it again, boil it

to steam, and recondense it; at the end, you’ll

have the same substance you started with, and its

specific heat will be just as it was at the beginning.

In other words, those changes are completely

reversible. If you take a steak from the refrigerator

at 5 °C / 41 °F and warm it to 20 °C / 68 °F, that is

also a reversible change. You’ve made the meat

15 °C / 27 °F hotter. But not long after you return

the steak to the refrigerator, it will be essentially

the same as before, aside from some subtle

changes due to enzymatic activity and aging.

If you instead heat a steak from 40 °C to 55 °C

/ 104 °F to 131 °F, however, the appearance,

texture, and taste of the meat all change profoundly.

As in the previous example, the temperature

of the meat rises just 15 °C / 27 °F. But in

this case the heating elicits chemical changes

that transform the meat from raw to mediumrare.

You can cool the steak back to 40 °C /

104 °F, but it will never again be raw. This transformation

is what we mean when we refer to an

irreversible change.

Most cooking is about achieving such irreversible

changes in a controlled way. Changes of this

kind typically occur within narrow bands of

temperature, and very little heat energy is needed

to make them. Much of the difficulty in cooking is

getting and keeping food within those narrow

bands of temperature where miniscule amounts of

THE TECHNOLOGY OF

Measuring Temperature

Small changes in temperature can make all the difference in

cooking. Cooks should thus measure temperature as accurately

as they can. One famous chef argues that by touching

a skewer to his lip he can judge temperature better than any

digital thermometer. We beg to differ—although few of these

devices are accurate to better than 1 °C / 1.8 °F, they all outperform

the human lip.

Thermometers always trade accuracy for expediency; the

truest thermometers tend to be the slowest. The probes

below are ranked roughly in order of their accuracy from least

to most. Bear in mind that accuracy depends on how skillfully

thermometers are used as well as on their inherent capabilities.

THE TECHNOLOGY OF

Measuring Specific Heat

To measure the specific heat capacity of a food, which

affects how long it takes to cook, researchers use a tool

called a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC).

Because the DSC can measure specific heat at a wide

range of temperatures, it can help to identify the irreversible

chemical changes that occur as cooking alters the

structure and properties of the food. In the right hands,

a DSC can reveal the precise temperatures at which crystals

break down, proteins unravel, fats melt, or juices evaporate.

In a DSC, a small sample of the food rests on a metal

platform inside the device’s chamber. The machine slowly

heats the sample, degree by degree, while keeping careful

track of exactly how much electrical energy it has expended.

The more energy that goes in before the sample temperature

rises one degree, the higher the specific heat at

that temperature.

Thermocouple K

A temperature difference

between two metals in the

probe produces a voltage that

is translated into temperature.

Accuracy: ±2.8 °C / ±5.0 °F

Analog dial

A probe connects to a metal strip

that expands when heated,

rotating a needle over a scale.

Accuracy: ±2.5 °C / ±4.5 °F

Infrared

A sensor measures the spectrum

of long-wavelength light emitted

by an object, which varies

with temperature.

Accuracy: ±2.0 °C / ±3.6 °F

Thermistor

A metal bead encased in glass

measures electrical resistance,

which changes in proportion

to temperature.

Accuracy: ±1.5 °C / ±2.7 °F

Temperature (°F)

130 150

170 190

We placed a piece of Kobe beef cheek into a differential scanning calorimeter (left) and

gradually heated it to typical cooking temperatures. Energy input per degree of heating

Specific heat

Collagen

shrinks

Tightly bound water desorbs

and proteins unravel

Collagen

turns to gelatin

60 70

80

Temperature (°C)

(right) rose near 63 °C / 145 °F and again near 78 °C / 170 °F, signaling the irreversible

changes in protein chemistry that transform meat from raw to cooked.

90

Thermocouple T

This device works like

a thermocouple K, but uses

different metals as sensors.

Accuracy: ±1.6 °C / ±2.9 °F

Analog liquid

A compound such as mercury or

ethanol expands readily with heat

inside a graduated glass capillary.

Accuracy: ±1.0 °C / ±1.8 °F

Platinum resistance

temperature detector

Electrical resistance in a coil

of platinum wire changes in

proportion to temperature.

Accuracy: ±0.1 °C / ±0.2 °F

Don’t be fooled by all the decimal

places on your thermal probe’s

readout. A thermometer can be

precise (as implied by all those

digits) without being accurate.

Precision means that the instrument

will give the same value each

time you repeat the same measurement.

Accuracy means it gives

a number that accords with the

actual temperature—something no

amount of digits can ensure.

268 VOLUME 1 · HISTORY AND FUNDAMENTALS HEAT AND E NERGY 269

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!