04.07.2023 Views

Modernist-Cuisine-Vol.-1-Small

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1

We explore several techniques

pioneered by This in this book,

including chocolate or Camembert

cheese blended into a whipped

cream-style foam (see page 4·281),

salt in oil (see page 330), and the

now ubiquitous 65 °C egg (see page

4·78).

THE HISTORY OF

Food Science

some and refuting others. He often works by doing

his own research; to test a claim from a medieval

cookbook, This roasted whole suckling pigs and

confirmed that cutting the head off after cooking

keeps the skin crisp, because it allows steam

trapped under the skin to escape.

In addition to examining “precisions,” This

created a formal notation for cooking called the

CDS/NPOS system. (CDS stands for “complex

dispersive system” and NPOS for “nonperiodical

organization of space.”) Similar in spirit to formal

mathematical notation or chemical formulae,

This’s system serves as an abstract description of

the processes and techniques used in cooking. He

believes this notation will be useful to chefs in

creating new dishes, although few chefs seem to

agree. The notation is so abstract that it has not

been widely adopted by either chefs or mainstream

food scientists.

In some cases, however, This has invented or

researched techniques that could be used as a

point of departure for new dishes. This and Pierre

Gagnaire have collaborated to come up with many

new recipes, which are featured on Gagnaire’s

website (pierre-gagnaire.com), some of which are

featured in this book.

Agriculture and food preservation have been around for

millennia (see page 6), but these disciplines were not widely

studied as sciences until the 19th century, when canning

and pasteurization were developed (see Louis Pasteur,

page 1·148). Today, food science is made of several different

disciplines, including food chemistry, food engineering,

and microbiology. The closely related field of agricultural

science often overlaps with food science.

Many food scientists work in the food-manufacturing

industry, at universities, or in government positions to

create new food products and to improve methods of

processing, packaging, distributing, and storing foods. For

some scientists, this means determining ways to get optimal

results from traditional cooking and food-processing

techniques such as baking, drying, and pasteurization.

Other food scientists research and develop new methods

In a 2010 paper in the journal Chemical Reviews,

the physicist Peter Barham and his coauthors

present an excellent summary of the key scientific

findings of molecular gastronomy to date. They

argue that it is an emerging scientific discipline.

Whether that assertion is true is an intriguing

question, but the answer is still unclear, at least to

us. Conventional food scientists, not “molecular

gastronomists,” are responsible for many of the

scientific findings reviewed in the paper.

Food science has origins that stretch back at

least a century (see Food Science, below), and the

discipline has been a major focus for thousands of

researchers in recent decades. What distinguishes

“molecular gastronomy” from other forms of food

science? Is there something really new here, or is

this just a case of applying a trendy new name?

The principal answer seems to be that what

Barham and his colleagues call molecular gastronomy

is focused on home and restaurant cooking.

Previously, food science tended to be applied

almost exclusively to large-scale commercial and

industrial food processing. Indeed, the birth of

food science as a discipline was driven largely by

the emergence of the packaged- and canned-food

industries in the early 20th century.

of food production and processing.

Agricultural scientists study crops and livestock, and

develop ways of improving quality and yield. They also may

research methods of converting agricultural commodities

into consumer food products.

There were roughly 17,000 people working in food and

agricultural science in the United States in 2008. About

20% of these scientists worked for manufacturing companies,

15% in educational institutions, and 7% for the federal

government (primarily the U.S. Department of

Agriculture).

Research on food and agricultural science is published in

dozens of academic journals around the world. These

journals run the gamut of food science disciplines, from

Cereal Science to Meat Science to Dairy Science, and from

Molecular Nutrition & Food Research to Food Hydrocolloids.

During most of its existence, food science was

all but invisible to restaurant chefs and the general

public. That’s because food science was mostly

funded by industry or by government agriculture

departments that wanted to boost the agricultural

economy on a large scale. Most of the findings

ascribed to molecular gastronomy were discovered

in the course of those activities.

There are also many issues that food science has

simply not investigated, because they are not

important to large-scale food manufacturers.

Nicholas Kurti is famous for saying, “It is a sad

reflection on our civilization that, while we can

and do measure the temperature in the atmosphere

of Venus, we do not know what goes on

inside our soufflés.” Nobody in industry cared

much about soufflés; you couldn’t make them in

bulk to put on supermarket shelves. And if nobody

in industry cared, food scientists tended not to

investigate. It’s not like the U.S. Department of

Agriculture or the National Science Foundation,

both major funders of academic research, care

much about soufflés either.

Starting in the mid-1980s, the situation changed

dramatically, as McGee, This, Barham, and others

shined the light of science on problems of home and

restaurant cooking. The main distinguishing

feature of molecular gastronomy is that it does care

about all types of food, including home and restaurant

food (and, yes, soufflés). In asking scientific

questions about these foods, Barham, This, and

their colleagues are performing a great service.

Heston Blumenthal and

The Fat Duck

In 1982, a British family on holiday turned up at

L’Oustau de Baumanière, a famous Michelin

three-star restaurant in Provence. Like many

tourists, the family had read about the restaurant

and decided to seek it out. None of the party had

ever been to a fine-dining restaurant, but since

they were in France, it seemed like a good thing to

try. It was by all accounts an excellent meal, which

is to be expected of such a restaurant.

What was less expected was the effect it had on

one of the dinersa 16-year-old boywho

decided that night to become a chef. The boy was

Heston Blumenthal, and 22 years later his restaurant,

The Fat Duck, would also have three Michelin

stars and would be proclaimed by many

food critics as the best restaurant on Earth.

Aside from a weeklong stage in the kitchen of

Raymond Blanc’s Manoir Aux Quat’ Saisons,

Blumenthal had no formal culinary training. He

was born in 1966 in Berkshire, England (where he

still lives with his wife and children). After his

eye-opening dinner at Baumanière, he spent a

decade poring over Escoffier, Larousse Gastronomique,

and the other classic texts on French

cuisine, teaching himself to cook. When he could

afford it, he traveled to France on culinary research

missions. In 1986, he read Harold McGee’s

On Food and Cooking, an experience that he says

“literally changed my life.”

Blumenthal realized he could not accept what

was written in the classic texts at face value.

McGee’s book showed that they might have gotten

it wrong. Instead, Blumenthal came to question

and challenge everything about cooking until it

had been proved or demonstrated. That, of course,

is the essence of the scientific method. Although

Blumenthal is quick to argue that he is no scientist,

his skeptical and fact-driven approach to cuisine is

at its essence a form of scientific inquiry. This

attitude of exploration is perhaps the greatest thing

he learned from McGee.

In 1995, Blumenthal opened The Fat Duck,

serving a menu of classic brasserie dishes. Although

this menu featured radically different food than he

would begin serving several years later, he was

already using culinary science to perfect his dishes.

Heston Blumenthal stands at the front

door to his restaurant, The Fat Duck.

Heston Blumenthal isn’t the only

chef who found his calling via a

memorable teenage meal. For his

sixteenth birthday, Jean-George

Vongerichten’s parents took him

to the legendary Auberge de L’Ill,

a Michelin-three-star restaurant in

the town of Illhaeusern, located in

Alsace. The boy was so taken with

the experience that he, too,

decided on the spot to become a

chef. His first culinary job was as

an apprentice at the same restaurant,

under renowned chef Paul

Haeberlin.

48 VOLUME 1 · HISTORY AND FUNDAMENTALS

HISTORY 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!