06.01.2013 Views

Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005 - World Health ...

Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005 - World Health ...

Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005 - World Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4<br />

AIR QUALITY GUIDELINES<br />

In addition to guideline values, interim targets are given for levels of PM, ozone<br />

and sulfur dioxide. Th ese are proposed as incremental steps in a progressive reduction<br />

of air pollution, and are intended for use in areas where pollution is high.<br />

Th ese targets aim to promote a shift from high air pollutant concentrations, with<br />

acute and serious health consequences, to lower concentrations. If these targets<br />

were to be achieved, one could expect signifi cant reductions in risks for acute and<br />

chronic health eff ects from air pollution. Progress towards the guideline values<br />

should, however, be the ultimate objective of air quality management and health<br />

risk reduction in all areas.<br />

Th e fact that other pollutants, such as carbon monoxide, were not included<br />

in the present review refl ects the limited resources available to the project. As a<br />

result, the 2000 WHO guidelines (1) for pollutants not considered in the current<br />

update remain in eff ect. Th e steering group recommends that the update of the<br />

guidelines be expanded to include additional pollutants as soon as possible, as<br />

resources become available.<br />

Key scientific issues in the development of the guidelines<br />

Th e guidelines are based on the extensive scientifi c evidence on air pollution and<br />

its health consequences. Although this information has gaps and uncertainties,<br />

it off ers a strong foundation for the guidelines. Several overall research fi ndings<br />

need to be emphasized with regard to the guidelines.<br />

First, the evidence for ozone and PM shows risks to health at concentrations<br />

currently found in many cities in developed countries; these epidemiological<br />

fi ndings imply that guidelines cannot provide full protection, since thresholds<br />

below which adverse eff ects do not occur have not been identifi ed.<br />

Second, an increasing range of adverse health eff ects has been linked to air<br />

pollution, and at ever-lower pollutant concentrations. Th is is especially true of<br />

airborne PM. New studies use more refi ned methods and more subtle but sensitive<br />

indicators of eff ects such as physiological measures (e.g. changes in lung<br />

function, infl ammation markers). Th erefore, the updated guidelines could be<br />

based both on these sensitive indicators and on the most critical and traditional<br />

population health indicators, such as mortality and unscheduled hospital admissions.<br />

Th ird, the complexity of the air pollution mixture has been better characterized,<br />

making more clear the limitations of controlling air pollution through<br />

guidelines for single pollutants. Nitrogen dioxide, for example, is a product of<br />

combustion and is generally found in the atmosphere in close association with<br />

other primary pollutants, including ultrafi ne particles. It is also a precursor of<br />

ozone and therefore co-exists in photochemically generated oxidant pollution.<br />

Nitrogen dioxide is itself toxic, and its concentrations are oft en strongly correlated<br />

with those of other toxic pollutants. As it is easier to measure, it is oft en used<br />

as a surrogate for the mixture as a whole. Achieving the guidelines for individual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!