06.01.2013 Views

Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005 - World Health ...

Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005 - World Health ...

Air Quality Guidelines Global Update 2005 - World Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PARTICULATE MATTER<br />

range of concentrations (some well above regulatory limits); and that the ambient<br />

PM to which people are exposed is a diverse mixture. There are numerous<br />

sources of ambient PM, comprising both particles released directly from combustion<br />

sources and those formed secondarily through complex chemical reactions.<br />

The complex characteristics of ambient PM have challenged researchers as<br />

they have attempted to characterize PM sources and exposures.<br />

As this chapter discusses, major advances have been made in understanding<br />

the relationship between actual human exposure and ambient concentration<br />

measurements. In developed countries, ambient particles are responsible for<br />

approximately 50% of an individual’s total PM2.5 exposure, with relatively little<br />

variability between different population subgroups (although with substantial<br />

within-group variability). In a developing country scenario with indoor biomass<br />

combustion and consequently much higher indoor exposures, the contribution<br />

of ambient particles, while still substantial, will be smaller. In the absence of indoor<br />

sources, indoor concentrations and consequently exposure to PM of ambient<br />

origin are largely determined by the air exchange characteristics of the indoor<br />

environment. On average, indoor concentrations of PM2.5 of ambient origin are<br />

40–70% of ambient PM2.5 concentrations. With this improved understanding of<br />

the relationships between exposure and ambient concentrations, the extensive<br />

database on ambient concentrations can be reliably used for risk evaluation.<br />

<strong>Health</strong> risk evaluation<br />

The 2000 review (1) found evidence sufficient to link PM to a variety of adverse<br />

effects on mortality and morbidity, in both the short and the long term. It offered<br />

quantitative estimates of risks for selected outcomes, based on the epidemiological<br />

information. Subsequent evidence reaffirms the multiple associations of PM<br />

with adverse health effects and broadens the range of effects to more conclusively<br />

encompass cardiovascular outcomes. There is substantial new evidence from<br />

time series studies of daily mortality, particularly from multi-city studies that<br />

span Europe and North America. Methodological concerns about time series<br />

studies that surfaced since the previous review have been addressed, and major<br />

re-analyses of key time series studies have been completed. The cohort studies of<br />

mortality have been extended, and the findings of the two most critical studies<br />

validated through an extensive, peer-reviewed re-analysis. Many further studies<br />

of morbidity indicators have also been carried out.<br />

The epidemiological evidence is supported by an increasingly strong foundation<br />

of toxicological research. Various mechanisms have been proposed by which<br />

PM may cause and/or exacerbate acute and chronic diseases. Inflammation due<br />

to the production of reactive oxygen species is emerging as a central mechanism.<br />

However, one of the most vexing research challenges has been identifying physical<br />

and chemical characteristics of PM determining toxicity, so that linkages can<br />

be made back to the sources of the most injurious particles. This review, along<br />

273

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!