09.01.2013 Views

Seafood ChoiCeS

Seafood ChoiCeS

Seafood ChoiCeS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Seafood</strong> Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks<br />

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11762.html<br />

00 SEAFOOD ChOICES<br />

effect of EPA/DHA from seafood is difficult to isolate from benefits provided<br />

by other dietary changes.<br />

Randomized Controlled Trials<br />

The effect of fish-oil supplementation has been studied in a metaanalysis<br />

of experimental studies (Geleijnse et al., 2002). The overall results<br />

of 36 trials examined indicate that the mean adjusted net reduction in systolic<br />

and diastolic blood pressure was –2.1 mmHg (95% CI –3.2 to –1.0),<br />

and –1.6 mmHg (95% CI –2.2 to –1.0), respectively. Moreover, systolic and<br />

diastolic blood pressure reductions were significantly greater in older (mean<br />

age ≥45 years) than younger populations, and in hypertensive (blood pressure<br />

≥140/90 mmHg) compared to normotensive populations. Inconsistent<br />

results among studies in women precluded adequate analysis based on sex.<br />

Body mass index, trial duration, and seafood dose did not affect the blood<br />

pressure response noted with fish-oil supplementation. Studies conducted in<br />

diabetic patients were not included in the meta-analysis. The review by Balk<br />

et al. (2004) found only small and inconsistent net effects of EPA/DHA on<br />

blood pressure levels of diabetic patients.<br />

A single RCT with advice to increase seafood intake has been reported.<br />

The Diet and Reinfarction Trial (DART) examined the effect of advice to<br />

consume seafood on blood pressure outcomes at 6 and 24 months in over<br />

2000 men with a history of MI (Ness et al., 1999). The average intake of<br />

the group advised to consume fish was 330 mg of EPA compared to 100 mg<br />

in the control group. There were no significant differences in blood pressure<br />

detected between the groups at either 6 or 24 months.<br />

Obser ational Studies<br />

Appleby et al. (2002) examined the effect of diet and lifestyle factors<br />

on differences between meat eaters, seafood eaters, vegetarians, and vegans<br />

on the prevalence of self-reported hypertension, and mean systolic and diastolic<br />

blood pressure. Data for the analysis was obtained from the Oxford<br />

cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition<br />

(EPIC-Oxford). More than 11,000 adult men and women were classified<br />

into the four diet groups for analysis. Results showed that age-adjusted<br />

prevalence of self-reported hypertension in men was 15 percent in meat<br />

eaters, 9.8 percent in both seafood eaters and vegetarians, and 5.8 percent<br />

in vegans. In women, the prevalence was 12.1, 9.6, 8.9, and 7.7 percent in<br />

the respective diet groups. After adjustment for body mass index (BMI), the<br />

group differences decreased in both men and women. When seafood eaters<br />

were compared to vegetarians, no benefit was seen that could be attributed<br />

to seafood consumption per se.<br />

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!