09.01.2013 Views

Seafood ChoiCeS

Seafood ChoiCeS

Seafood ChoiCeS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Seafood</strong> Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks<br />

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11762.html<br />

ANALYSIS OF ThE BALANCING OF BENEFITS AND RISKS<br />

selenium. <strong>Seafood</strong> also is a primary source of the omega-3 fatty acids EPA<br />

and DHA. The evidence detailed in Chapter 3 indicates that consumption<br />

of seafood and/or EPA/DHA by pregnant females may provide benefits to<br />

their developing fetuses. Infants receiving EPA/DHA either from breast milk<br />

or supplemented formula may benefit in terms of neurological and visual<br />

development. Similarly, there is evidence that consumption of fish is associated<br />

with cardiovascular benefits in the general population.<br />

These benefits must be balanced against risks to health, as reviewed<br />

in Chapter 4, from exposure to chemical and/or microbial contamination<br />

that may be present in some seafood available to US consumers. The bestcharacterized<br />

risk from chemical contamination of seafood is from methylmercury,<br />

a potent neurotoxin. Thus, the population groups at greatest risk<br />

from exposure to contaminants in seafood are the developing fetus, infants,<br />

and young children. As discussed in Chapter 4, a Reference Dose (RfD) has<br />

been established for methylmercury on the basis of developmental tests in<br />

children born to mothers from populations where seafood is a major part of<br />

their diets. At the same time, evidence suggests the fetus and infant may be<br />

among the principal beneficiaries from certain nutrients in seafood. Evidence<br />

available on levels of MeHg that may be detrimental to nonpregnant adults<br />

has not allowed the formulation of a similar reference dose based on risks<br />

to these population segments.<br />

In establishing their joint advisory targeted at pregnant women and<br />

children, the US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and Food<br />

and Drug Administration (FDA) examined potential intakes of MeHg<br />

that would occur in pregnant women given consumption patterns using<br />

various available commercial sources of seafood. If predatory fish high in<br />

mercury were avoided completely, they concluded that up to 12 ounces of<br />

fish (four 3-ounce servings per week) could be consumed without exceeding<br />

the RfD dose that has been established with studies in populations of<br />

women consuming substantial amounts of seafood (US EPA/FDA, 2004)<br />

(see Chapter 4). Though the committee recognized that the RfD was not<br />

a “bright line” that established a firm cutoff for risk, the FDA/EPA fish<br />

advisory provides reasonable guidelines for pregnant women to consume<br />

seafood in amounts that may confer benefit without significantly increasing<br />

risk. There is little evidence available about levels of methylmercury that<br />

may be detrimental to other segments of the population.<br />

Risks from other contaminants in seafood are, comparatively, less wellcharacterized<br />

than methylmercury. Contamination from persistant organic<br />

pollutants (POPs) has been characterized at exposure levels that result from<br />

industrial releases or occupational exposure, and for fish-consumers in<br />

geographic areas where contaminants are more concentrated. However, at<br />

lower levels of exposure there is less information available on adverse health<br />

effects. In addition, levels of dioxin-like compounds (DLCs) and polychlori-<br />

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!