09.01.2013 Views

Seafood ChoiCeS

Seafood ChoiCeS

Seafood ChoiCeS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Seafood</strong> Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks<br />

http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11762.html<br />

SEAFOOD ChOICES<br />

mercury level at delivery of 0.55 ppm (range 0.02–2.38; 10 percent had<br />

levels >1.2 ppm). At 6 months of age, infants’ scores on a visual recognition<br />

memory task were positively associated with maternal fish intake<br />

during the second trimester (4 points for each additional weekly serving),<br />

but inversely associated with maternal hair mercury level (7.5 points per<br />

ppm). Performance was best among infants whose mother consumed more<br />

than two servings of fish per week but whose hair mercury level was less<br />

than 1.2 ppm. This study was designed as a study of nutrition rather than<br />

of methylmercury intake, however, so women were asked about their fish<br />

intake using categories (canned tuna, shellfish, “dark meat” fish, other fish)<br />

that relate more directly to omega-3 fatty acid levels than to MeHg levels<br />

(see Box 3-1).<br />

Data germane to the balance between the benefits and risks associated<br />

with consumption of fish and development in children were also reported<br />

from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC),<br />

a large ongoing birth cohort study in the UK (Daniels et al., 2004). In a<br />

subsample of 1054 of 10,092 eligible children, associations were evaluated<br />

between maternal fish consumption during week 32 of gestation, reported<br />

on a food frequency questionnaire, and maternal reports of children’s language<br />

development at 15 months and general development at 18 months.<br />

The categories used in collecting data on the types of fish consumed were<br />

“white fish” (cod, haddock, plaice, fish sticks, etc.) and “oily fish” (pilchards,<br />

sardines, mackerel, tuna, herring, kippers, trout, salmon, etc.). Most<br />

women (88 percent) reported eating fish during pregnancy. Of these, 65<br />

percent reported eating fish from both categories. Unfortunately, this way<br />

of classifying fish results in groupings that differ from those that would<br />

result if classification were based on mercury levels. Overall, children’s<br />

developmental abilities, as reported by mothers, increased modestly with<br />

increased maternal fish intake during pregnancy. Most of the benefit appeared<br />

to be associated with any fish consumption, compared to none, as<br />

maternal consumption of fish more than one to three times per week did not<br />

seem to confer additional benefits, at least with regard to the child development<br />

outcomes assessed. Higher mercury concentration in umbilical tissue,<br />

for which the median was 0.01 µg/g wet weight, was not associated with<br />

adverse developmental outcomes in children, although cord tissue mercury<br />

is not a well-established biomarker of exposure. Cord mercury level did<br />

increase across strata of maternal fish intake, although the greatest increase<br />

was between the “none” and “1 per 2 weeks” strata, with little increase<br />

evident in the two strata representing greater fish intake (“1–3 per week”<br />

and “4+ per week”) (see Box 3-1).<br />

Jensen et al. (2005) reported that the usual substantial neuropsychological<br />

benefits associated with breastfeeding were not evident among the children<br />

in the Faroe Islands cohort. The authors speculated that contaminants pres-<br />

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!