12.01.2013 Views

ST 520 Statistical Principles of Clinical Trials - NCSU Statistics ...

ST 520 Statistical Principles of Clinical Trials - NCSU Statistics ...

ST 520 Statistical Principles of Clinical Trials - NCSU Statistics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 8 <strong>ST</strong> <strong>520</strong>, A. TSIATIS and D. Zhang<br />

Remarks<br />

• If the null hypothesis <strong>of</strong> no treatment effect is true; namely<br />

H0 : ∆ COM = ∆ NC = ∆ = 0<br />

– The intent to treat analysis, which estimates (∆ COM θ), gives an unbiased estimator<br />

<strong>of</strong> treatment difference (under H0) and can be used to compute a valid test <strong>of</strong> the null<br />

hypothesis<br />

• If we were interested in estimating the causal parameter ∆ COM , the difference in response<br />

rate between treatment and placebo among compliers only, then<br />

– the intent to treat analysis gives an underestimate <strong>of</strong> this population causal effect<br />

• Since there are no data available to estimate π NC<br />

1 , we are not able to estimate ∆ NC or ∆<br />

As-treated analysis<br />

In one version <strong>of</strong> an as treated analysis we compare the response rate <strong>of</strong> patients randomized to<br />

receive active drug who comply to all patients randomized to receive placebo. That is, we<br />

compute<br />

∆AT = π COM<br />

1<br />

− π0.<br />

Since π0 = πCOM 0 θ + πNC 0 (1 − θ), after some algebra we get that<br />

∆AT = ∆ + (π COM<br />

1<br />

− π NC<br />

1 )(1 − θ),<br />

where ∆ denotes the average causal treatment effect. This makes clear that when there is<br />

noncompliance, (θ < 1), the as-treated analysis will yield an unbiased estimate <strong>of</strong> the average<br />

causal treatment effect only if π COM<br />

1<br />

= π NC<br />

1 . As we’ve argued previously, this assumption is not<br />

generally true and hence the as-treated analysis can result in biased estimation even under the<br />

null hypothesis.<br />

Some Additional Remarks about Intention-to-Treat (ITT) Analyses<br />

• By not allowing any exclusions, we are preserving the integrity <strong>of</strong> randomization<br />

PAGE 129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!