12.01.2013 Views

ST 520 Statistical Principles of Clinical Trials - NCSU Statistics ...

ST 520 Statistical Principles of Clinical Trials - NCSU Statistics ...

ST 520 Statistical Principles of Clinical Trials - NCSU Statistics ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 9 <strong>ST</strong> <strong>520</strong>, A. TSIATIS and D. Zhang<br />

is the value <strong>of</strong> the non-centrality parameter necessary so that a non-central chi-square distributed<br />

random variable with K − 1 degrees <strong>of</strong> freedom and non-centrality parameter φ 2 (α, β, K − 1)<br />

will exceed the value χ 2 α;K−1 with probability (1 − β). Tables <strong>of</strong> φ2 (α, β, K − 1) for α = .05 were<br />

provided in chapter 7.<br />

For example, if we take K = 3, then in order to ensure that we have at least 90% power to detect<br />

a hazard ratio between any two treatments that may exceed 1.5, using a logrank test at the .05<br />

level <strong>of</strong> significance, we would need the total number <strong>of</strong> deaths to exceed<br />

d =<br />

2 × 3 × 12.654<br />

= 462.<br />

{log(1.5)} 2<br />

We can contrast this to a two-sample comparison which needs 256 events. As in the two-sample<br />

problem, the computations during the design stage will involve the best guesses for the accrual<br />

rate, accrual period, follow-up period, and underlying treatment-specific survival distributions<br />

which can be translated to the desired number <strong>of</strong> failures. Thus we can experiment with different<br />

values <strong>of</strong><br />

• accrual rate a(u)<br />

• underlying treatment-specific failure time distributions Fj(t) = P(T ≤ t|A = j) = 1 −<br />

Sj(t), j = 1, . . .,K under the alternative hypothesis <strong>of</strong> interest (we may take these at the<br />

least favorable configuration)<br />

• the accrual period A<br />

• the length <strong>of</strong> study L<br />

so that<br />

K�<br />

j=1<br />

dj{a(·), Fj(·), A, L} = 2Kφ2 (α, β, K − 1)<br />

γ2 ,<br />

A<br />

where dj{a(·), Fj(·), A, L} denotes the expected number <strong>of</strong> deaths in treatment group j as a<br />

function <strong>of</strong> a(·), Fj(·), A, L, computed using equation (9.5).<br />

CALGB 8541 Example<br />

We now return to the data from CALGB 8541 which compared three treatments in a randomized<br />

study <strong>of</strong> node positive stage II breast cancer patients. The three treatments were<br />

PAGE 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!