18.01.2013 Views

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

Through-Wall Imaging With UWB Radar System - KEMT FEI TUKE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.5 <strong>Radar</strong> <strong>Imaging</strong> Methods Overview 29<br />

as<br />

where<br />

��<br />

ψ(x, z = ∆z1, t) =<br />

φ0(kx, f)e 2πi(kxx−kz1∆z1−ft) dkxdf (2.5.44)<br />

kz1 =<br />

�<br />

f 2<br />

v 2 1<br />

− k 2 x. (2.5.45)<br />

(2.5.44) is an expression for downward continuation or extrapolation of the wavefield<br />

to the depth ∆z1. The wavefield extrapolation expression in (2.5.44) is more<br />

simply written in the Fourier domain to suppress the integration that performs<br />

the inverse Fourier transform:<br />

��<br />

φ(kx, z = ∆z1, f) = φ0(kx, f)e 2πikz1∆z1dkxdf. (2.5.46)<br />

Now consider a further extrapolation to estimate the wavefield at the bottom of<br />

the layer two (z = ∆z1 + ∆z2). This can be written as:<br />

φ(kx, z = ∆z1 + ∆z2, f) = φ(kx, z = ∆z1, f)T (kx, f)e 2πikz2∆z2 (2.5.47)<br />

where T (kx, f) is a correction factor for the transmission loss endured by the wave<br />

as it crossed from layer two into layer one.<br />

If this method want to be applied in praxis, phase shift algorithm [96] would<br />

have to be studied into more depth in order to prevent many of unwanted effects<br />

and incorrect implementations.<br />

The Fourier method discussed in this section is based upon the solution of<br />

the scalar wave equation using Fourier transforms. Though Kirchhoff methods<br />

seem superficially quite different from Fourier methods, the uniqueness theorems<br />

from partial differential equation theory guarantee that they are equivalent [96].<br />

However, this equivalence only applies to the problem for which both approaches<br />

are exact solutions to the wave equation and that is the case of a constant velocity<br />

medium, with regular wavefield sampling. In all other cases, both methods<br />

are implemented with differing approximations and can give very distinct results.<br />

Furthermore, even in the exact case, the methods have different computational<br />

artifacts [96].<br />

2.5.7 Improvements in f-k Migration<br />

f-k migration obtained title of the most often used migration method in praxis<br />

due to its fast computation and very precise image results. A lot of improvements<br />

and modifications have been done in f-k migration. They are mostly described in<br />

airborne, or GPR scenarios. The most important of them will be shortly described<br />

in this section.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!